Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
I've seen no change, and given your recent posts in the Galfond thread, I'd suggest that maybe you should consider that your perception that there's been a change in moderation might be caused by your own biases.
Whatever the case may be, I highly doubt NVG mods will be taking your suggestion to delete accounts that you don't believe are appropriately critical of Doug Polk.
We seem to disagree which interesting, because the change seems extremely clear to me. Madlex seems at least to have an inkling into what I'm talking about. If you haven't listened to the evidence then you also probably didn't read galfond explain that the evidence matters and is beyond damning here. Doug isn't denying anything. It's all plain sight.
Quote:
Originally Posted by madlex
We're not the opinion police and the "gravity of the situation" lies certainly in the eye of the beholder. If someone disputes proven facts we handle that appropriately in the same way we've done it in the past. Your "obvious reality" might be very different than the one of other posters though.
FWIW, old ownership had a different professional (and potentially personal) relationship with Doug than the new one. That might have had an impact regarding negative threads about him in the past but had nothing to do with the mod team.
I think so.
I'm not sure if either of you are familiar with the doug situation. But its not a debate. Doug has manipulated the associated social media to make it LOOK like its a debate and its THAT ACTION which is terrible. Because now he has people debating whether or not this guy is an abusive pedophile but really its clear that the guy is a victim of being raped as a child and doug.
There isn't any gray area, expect for these account that are stating there is but I don't think for a 2nd bobo fett would say its unclear if the guy that got raped a as child is promoting pedophilia. So the question is really does doug still have the pull to create and uphold false narratives. There is no real plausible definability for the human mods here in this regard. And I seem to be the only one in the community that has ever been willing to stand up for what is right.
Its a HORRRIBLE THING that doug has made people think that this subject of whether or not this guy was raped as a child is debatable and whether or not this guy is a child raper. I cant really think of a more terrible position experience for a human. Does someone want to suggest something that is worse?
And just for another important example of a historical issue in this regard which doug is probably absolutely exploiting is this behavior and modership:
https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/s...&postcount=112
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJPW
Hi JB, get help.
Sincerely,
everyone on twoplustwo
It shouldn't be allowed and I FULLY believe its allowed because of a historical artifact of this site, from a setup that perhaps no longer exist (somehow this isn't a shot at say mason and sklansky cause I did appreciate the sort of constitution they seem to imply) . There should an easy blanket rule that any mod can remove any post on the basis that its
a contentless ad hominem.. Hominems are fine and great and fun, but contentless ones that do nothing but derail any possible dialogue should be discouraged.
You shouldn't be allowed to do that especially IF it comes with no engagement in the dialogue. Here this person gets to make the implication that the whole community thinks I have a mental disorder and that gets upheld and obviously if i try to defend myself, I will get mod'd for it.
But what is most important, and the trick I play, is that the content in my post is VERY CIRTICAL and would have stopped two plus two plus from advertising and benefiting from cypto based pokers scams if they had applied the insight. This is provable now. It was only my 'opinion' before it all happened.
There is no one here that claims to know more than me about the crypto and security related aspects of the evolving digital money resolution.
Until you remove baseless contentless ad hominems and accounts that perpetuate obvious harmful disinformation doug polk will control this community and the narrative on this site. And I'm waiting for this change because when its clear doug no longer has control, I'm going to expose joey Chicago for a high stakes. multi accounting scheme/scam.