Dealer: INTERNET POKERS posts the big blind of
$100
Dealer: mastrblastr raises to $300
Dealer: INTERNET POKERS raises to $1,100
Dealer: mastrblastr calls $800
Dealer: The flop is [6h 5d 2d]
Dealer: INTERNET POKERS has 15 seconds left
to act
Dealer: INTERNET POKERS bets $1,600
Dealer: mastrblastr raises to $4,200
Dealer: INTERNET POKERS has 15 seconds left
to act
Dealer: INTERNET POKERS has requested TIME
Dealer: INTERNET POKERS raises to $33,691.25,
and is all in
Dealer: mastrblastr calls $13,999.50, and is all in
Dealer: INTERNET POKERS shows [Ah Jh]
Dealer: mastrblastr shows [2s 2c]
Dealer: Uncalled bet of $15,491.75 returned to
INTERNET POKERS
Dealer: The turn is [7c]
Dealer: The river is [8s]
Dealer: INTERNET POKERS shows Ace Jack high
Dealer: mastrblastr shows three of a kind, Twos
Dealer: mastrblastr wins the pot ($38,598.50) with
three of a kind, Twos

wowow

omg someone semi-bluffed with what they thought was 30% equity

call the bruffin police!

edit: he also beats 78 atm

Full Tilt Poker $50/$100 No Limit Hold'em - 2 players
The Official 2+2 Hand Converter Powered By DeucesCracked.com

mastrblastr (BTN/SB): $16716.00
INTERNET POKERS (BB): $19999.50

Pre Flop: ($150.00)
mastrblastr raises to $300, INTERNET POKERS raises to $1100, mastrblastr calls $800

Flop: ($2200.00) 8 A 9 (2 players)
INTERNET POKERS bets $1500, mastrblastr calls $1500

Turn: ($5200.00) 7 (2 players)
INTERNET POKERS requests TIME, INTERNET POKERS bets $3500, mastrblastr calls $3500

River: ($12200.00) 7 (2 players)
INTERNET POKERS requests TIME, INTERNET POKERS bets $13899.50 all in, mastrblastr calls $10616 all in

Final Pot: $33432.00
mastrblastr shows Q A (two pair, Aces and Sevens)
INTERNET POKERS shows K J (a pair of Sevens)
mastrblastr wins $33431.50
(Rake: $0.50)

didnt db promise not to play hoss at lhe

I really cant believe there hasnt been any Hoss TBF and red pro curse posts.

I mean the guys has basically never lost in the last two years, then as soon as he goes red he has a -500k downswing.

1.He hasn't lost 500k. Patrik was in for 300k

2.He didn't lose because he was a red pro. He lost because Patrik adjusted to him in the middle of the match and probably had some rush too. Before Patrik adjusted, he was getting crushed. Hoss was up 280k at one point. If he quit then or if Patrik quit then, you wouldn't be making this post about red pro curse.

3.He hasn't lost this much before because he wasn't playing insanely great players like Patrik!

If ifs and buts were candy and nuts we'd all have a merry christmas.

He's down 100 big bets on the day which isn't that many in HULHE. He's also only just got his 2k/4k table which is truly a sick limit. I think most people underestimate just how big those 2k/4k games play relative to say 200/400 plo or nlhe.

Why do you believe you can differentiate between random fluctuations of luck and the adjustments in play that occur in a 2k/4k LHE match by railing?

Because you cant

patrik did at least

In general, you can't.

However, in this case you can assume there's a lot of adjusting by Patrik because he's a sicko.

also, note that i mentioned patrik was on some kind of rush too. I think it's a combination of both.

i dont understand how u can be a 'know it all' and yet seemilgly continue to redposit and ask the highstakes players for monies??

Sick sick bankroll management son!

anyway i'm not know it all. probably as clueless as any here.

ok thought that with your insight into the game you might actually PLAY or something... my bad. although i have talked with some incredibly intelligent beggars.

yep...fail.

http://www.tableratings.com/overview/federer007

not only was that funny, but a site i never new of, the mistikal adventures of interent pokers

Yes I play. I take shots. I lose. Like Livb112, I might some day learn. Or maybe not. Let's not derail my beloved thread anymore.

wtf he limped Q2s in the co 4 handed and got 300bb in with a non nut flush draw, no pair are you ****ing kidding me he deserves to be rich but not to win at poker.

I know, crazy isn't it, the best hand wins the money.

tbqh it's kinda surprising that you don't lose more money playing poker.

Full Tilt Poker Game #8328546443: Table RailHeaven (6 max) - $500/$1000 - No Limit Hold'em - 7:30:10 ET - 2008/10/03
Seat 4: David Benyamine ($42,797.50)
Seat 5: durrrr ($185,475)
Seat 6: Ziigmund ($121,698)
David Benyamine posts the small blind of $500
durrrr posts the big blind of $1,000
The button is in seat #6
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Ziigmund raises to $3,500
David Benyamine folds
durrrr has 15 seconds left to act
durrrr raises to $12,200
Ziigmund calls $8,700
*** FLOP *** [5c Qh 8h]
durrrr has 15 seconds left to act
durrrr bets $15,600
Ziigmund calls $15,600
*** TURN *** [5c Qh 8h] [3c]
durrrr has 15 seconds left to act
durrrr bets $27,200
Ziigmund has 15 seconds left to act
Ziigmund calls $27,200
*** RIVER *** [5c Qh 8h 3c] [Kh]
durrrr has 15 seconds left to act
GooGie MonA sits down
durrrr bets $130,475, and is all in
GooGie MonA stands up
Ziigmund calls $66,698, and is all in
Uncalled bet of $63,777 returned to durrrr
*** SHOW DOWN ***
durrrr shows [As Kc] a pair of Kings
Ziigmund shows [Ks Ah] a pair of Kings
durrrr ties for the pot ($121,947.50) with a pair of Kings
Ziigmund ties for the pot ($121,947.50) with a pair of Kings
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $243,896 | Rake $1
Board: [5c Qh 8h 3c Kh]
Seat 4: David Benyamine (small blind) folded before the Flop
Seat 5: durrrr (big blind) showed [As Kc] and won ($121,947.50) with a pair of Kings
Seat 6: Ziigmund (button) showed [Ks Ah] and won ($121,947.50) with a pair of Kings

Clearly you don't know much about Matt's style. He trys to play solid balanced close to optimal poker. If that's the case then Patrik can't really "adjust" to exploit him. Also, I think the two have played quite a lot so I don't know what Patrik would suddenly have learned midway through this session. It's just variance.

1. He is on about a 500k downswing against other players in Limit Holdem and also in HORSE.

2. Funny how you talk about 300k swings at this limit just being standard rushes, but then go on to say how well Patrik adjusted and that is why he won. Not just a rush.

3. A better way to say your statement would be "He has made this much before because he was playing insanely overrated players like Patrik".

Gus had a 600k+ day and nobody mentions it? WTF!!!