Quote:
Originally Posted by sagoland
YOU dont get it. Let me put it this way. Do you think his luck (rungood/bad) would be exactly the same in both scenarios? My answer is that it wouldnt. Im sure he would run fantastic against me and my opponents. This can of course only be proved by him playing same amount of hands at f.e. 0.25/0.50.
How do you guys dont get it. Rungood or runbad has nothing to do with how good player you play against. You only win more or lose more depending on your opponents.
To simplify: You go flip 10 times against a good playe and win all of them. Rungood.
You flip 10 times against a monkey and lose all of them. Runbad.
Or any other variation in which the wins are not 5-5 (+-0EV) is either good run or bad run.
That is only to demonstrate what rungood or runbad means (small sample also with only 10 allins). There is obviously rungood and runbad other than all-in EV, which is harder to determine.
But the point is your luck is not dependent on your oppponents. You winrate obviously is, which consists of your luck and your skill level opposed your opponents luck and skill level.