Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
*** NVG Low Content Thread: 1/3 less content than a regular NVG thread *** *** NVG Low Content Thread: 1/3 less content than a regular NVG thread ***

04-26-2016 , 01:11 PM
No doubt. I'm simply putting up all the possible options and giving a balanced assessment of them. As the best poker player in the world, I can't tell you for sure what is going on, but I can tell you where my money would be.
*** NVG Low Content Thread: 1/3 less content than a regular NVG thread *** Quote
04-26-2016 , 01:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by funplayer
And batair I hope you will stop arguing for a moment,
Never really argued with him.
*** NVG Low Content Thread: 1/3 less content than a regular NVG thread *** Quote
04-26-2016 , 01:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by batair
Never really argued with him.
My mistake.

Do you think this deserves a serious discussion though? Disingenuous behavior like this clearly hurts both the 2p2 business model AND the community. Are the admins owners and mods aware this is going on?

This post here is VERY explicate, and the quote is a VERY clear example of the truth of this matter: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...&postcount=729

And this argument is absolutely airtight: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...&postcount=732

Quote:
dis·in·gen·u·ous
ˌdisənˈjenyo͞oəs/
adjective
adjective: disingenuous

not candid or sincere, typically by pretending that one knows less about something than one really does.
synonyms: insincere, dishonest, untruthful, false, deceitful, duplicitous, lying, mendacious; hypocritical
I'm not just calling them names, I got them to perfectly admit and show the truth of this. For whatever reason (I cannot perfectly tell but nonetheless by the very definition of the word) they are trolling.

Last edited by funplayer; 04-26-2016 at 02:05 PM.
*** NVG Low Content Thread: 1/3 less content than a regular NVG thread *** Quote
04-26-2016 , 02:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by funplayer
My mistake.

Do you think this deserves a serious discussion though? Disingenuous behavior like this clearly hurts both the 2p2 business model AND the community. Are the admins owners and mods aware this is going on?

This post here is VERY explicate, and the quote is a VERY clear example of the truth of this matter: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...&postcount=729

And this argument is absolutely airtight: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...&postcount=732





I'm not just calling them names, I got them to perfectly admit and show the truth of this. They are trolling.
Serious discussion? That would be hard to have with him it seems. As far as banning him, no. If you think what he says hurts the community or is shilling. Counter it.
*** NVG Low Content Thread: 1/3 less content than a regular NVG thread *** Quote
04-26-2016 , 02:10 PM
There is nothing else to counter. You must not have understood:

Quote:
Namely one cannot have 1200 posts explaining the difference between the nature of recs and regs, while simultaneously claiming ignorance in regard to rake and expectation.
Their entire persona is a troll. This has clearly been shown and they have exposed the truth themselves.

I'm calling for a serious discussion among the regs, mods, admins, and owners.

The only reason a rational person could support this behaviors is if they were not aware of it.

The mods cannot just ban an opinion, even if its obviously wrong or bad. But this is a person that is clearly being disingenuous by the exact definition of the word.

The are 100% pure troll. And that is not allowed here.
*** NVG Low Content Thread: 1/3 less content than a regular NVG thread *** Quote
04-26-2016 , 02:24 PM
I've tried explaining that to the mods for what seems like an eternity, but he's still here posting his disingenuous crap and provoking responses from serious posters so he's the most successful troll in recent 2+2 history I guess.
*** NVG Low Content Thread: 1/3 less content than a regular NVG thread *** Quote
04-26-2016 , 02:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by xXPocketDucksXx
Tbh I find it despicable that a regular player like yourself would refer to a recreational player as "dumb". The idea that rec players don't win because they're more dumb than reg players is stupid and completely offensive. Many rec players simply don't have the time or commitment to the game that a reg has, some are just looking to gamble and have a good time believe it or not. Recs play poker for fun and because they hope to win (rather than expect to) - similar reasoning to why people play lotto/scratchcards, because it's fun and there's a chance to win something. Recs (who aren't purely gambling addicts) treat poker as a hobby/pastime, just like golf, table tennis, ice-skating, and other recreational activities where you pay for the experience. Poker's no different; recs pay for the experience in terms of rake and the money they lose to better players. Yes it's -EV, just like when someone pays a fee to play golf it's -EV, but that don't make nobody dumb. As for calling me dumb, well I actually used to be a strong winning 25nl reg who recently turned rec after quitting playing poker regularly because of other commitments (not to mention that also my IQ is in the high 130s). So no I'm certainly not dumb by any standards and please don't make prejudices again about me just for being a rec player.



Hi, the thing I like about Pokerstars is the vast selection of games that can suit whatever mood I'm in, in particular the games which are fast-paced and exciting. The hyper KO games for instance - I like the bright orange flashes of explosion whenever you knock someone out, it adds an extra level of excitement to the game. Spin and gos are also fun with the chance to win some big prizes and I love the wheel that spins round with that drum roll sound makes it pretty thrilling, making them a good social game to play with mates and a few drinks at the weekend. I also like the nice selection of promotions on offer throughout the year (right now there are actually 3 promos running - the cash game quests, the knockout promos and now the new MTT promo). For me as a rec player, the thing that matters the least to me is the rake, I don't really care whether the rake is 4%, 8%, 12%, just as long as it isn't so rocket high that it becomes obvious enough to detract from the playing experience. You regs have to remember that it's the recs Pokerstars has to cater for first and foremost - and I'm one of them.
shills gonna shill
*** NVG Low Content Thread: 1/3 less content than a regular NVG thread *** Quote
04-26-2016 , 02:55 PM
The "meta" discussion on trolling/shilling should go in this thread:

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/29...hread-1285169/
*** NVG Low Content Thread: 1/3 less content than a regular NVG thread *** Quote
04-26-2016 , 05:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by funplayer
I should think so too. Very much so. And batair I hope you will stop arguing for a moment, because its unnecessary. PD's image is inconsistent with ITSELF. It doesn't need external evidence or input.

Here's the thing. There is an urgent issue here. I can only think of three reasons this is going on. There is the either the possibility that PD has a cognitive problem (and therefore has a large gambling problem), OR that PD actually is a PS employee OR has family or friends that are employees of stars. There is clearly some emotional motivation to doing what they are doing.

I cannot tell which of these 3 possibilities they are, with such incomplete information so as a poker player I must feel that there is a 2/3rds chance they are actually legit shilling for stars.

I sympathize with the mods because there is a fine line between freedom of speech and censorship. But now there has been shown clear dis-ingenuity.

The problem for PD is that 2p2 was founded on reason and morality and has built their entire business model around it. PD threatens the value of the community for the reasons explained above.

Namely one cannot have 1200 posts explaining the difference between the nature of recs and regs, while simultaneously claiming ignorance in regard to rake and expectation.



*the rational choice for PD of course would be to choose "not shill" and claim cognition problems (regardless of the real truth!). Of course they cannot still claim to not understand exception. Given this line I also expect them to claim they don't have a gambling problem. But this would show more inconsistency to suggest that although they know the effects of rake on the game, they still continue to pour a ton of money and time into it.

**They might claim to not spend much time playing but of course they would be left with no way to justify spending so much time on a poker forum professing the importance of ps rake policy.

***and so of course since even PD agrees the games are being raked to an extent that recs are crushed, it perfectly stands to reason they are constantly losing a lot of money if they are playing as much as they post here.

****One cannot claim sincerity if the only motivation to be on 2p2 is to defend PS policy while not simultaneously spending an equally reasonable amount of time playing poker.
On 2p2, nah, that doesn't happen. Need more sample size, just variance
*** NVG Low Content Thread: 1/3 less content than a regular NVG thread *** Quote
04-26-2016 , 05:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by batair
Id prefer a low raked fun game over a high raked fun game.
I agree , if theres less rake you can make more money long term and over a really long time it's more fun for everyone because they lose less money
*** NVG Low Content Thread: 1/3 less content than a regular NVG thread *** Quote
04-26-2016 , 05:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohmyquad
shills gonna shill
This.

Why people keep arguing with obvious paid trolls is beyond me.
*** NVG Low Content Thread: 1/3 less content than a regular NVG thread *** Quote
04-26-2016 , 05:56 PM
Wow this thread turned to absolute nut low. Thanks pocketducks

Not to mention i probably got screwed over for some money
*** NVG Low Content Thread: 1/3 less content than a regular NVG thread *** Quote
04-26-2016 , 06:36 PM
pocket ducks gonna pocket ducks lol

kids literally typed 10's of 1000's of words across multiple threads here defending stars for reasons i'm not even sure he knows
*** NVG Low Content Thread: 1/3 less content than a regular NVG thread *** Quote
04-26-2016 , 07:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spudhead
pocket ducks gonna pocket ducks lol

kids literally typed 10's of 1000's of words across multiple threads here defending stars for reasons i'm not even sure he knows
*** NVG Low Content Thread: 1/3 less content than a regular NVG thread *** Quote
04-26-2016 , 07:25 PM
Guys, I think you're overlooking a possiility of who the real troll might be here - "funplayer", the account was made this month. His first post was against me in this thread, and so are all his subsequent posts. Even his posts seem a bit trolly to me, wouldn't expect a genuine new account to immediately find this thread and start bashing someone.

Quote:
Originally Posted by funplayer
You are claiming to be a player that is ignorant in regard to rake and expectation, but you are also perfectly explaining these concepts in your defense of poker stars policy.

Your image is incoherent

Let's assume your account is genuine for a moment. The problem is you are only seeing this through "reg goggles". You are making out that anyone who plays in a game which is -EV is just "ignorant" or oblivious to the fact that they are losers in the game. But only a reg would think like this. Yes I'm well aware that the expectation of scratchcards is negative, but I still buy them from time to time (not very often, but I still do it). That doesn't mean I'm ignorant, I buy the scratchcards because I enjoy them and sometimes I'll get lucky and win something, or my friends might win something and if not then it's only $5 or whatever that I'll have lost.

Same with poker. Now I'm not sure what my EV is in these KO hypers or spin n gos because I haven't studied the game. But I may well be a -EV player after rake. But that doesn't mean they aren't fun to play every now and then. My flatmate's another example of someone who's very smart (top grades at 3rd year uni), but still gambles for fun. Regs looking through their one-sighted vision cannot see how it's possible that anyone with a brain would even buy scratchcards or other -EV games if they are aware it's -EV, well I'm smart and I still play these games for fun. Rec players are called recreational for a reason - they play poker as a recreational activity, a hobby/pastime for fun. Next you'll be approaching golfers and ice skaters and asking them about their hobby "why do you play these games? You're losing money from all the entry fees you pay, it's -EV!"
*** NVG Low Content Thread: 1/3 less content than a regular NVG thread *** Quote
04-26-2016 , 07:38 PM
Can some mod deal with PD, It really does get beyond a joke how he manages to bombard threads with 100 posts trying to walk the tightrope of legitimacy while trying to troll. just ban him already.
*** NVG Low Content Thread: 1/3 less content than a regular NVG thread *** Quote
04-26-2016 , 08:20 PM
Cmon now pontylad and everyone else, youre not adding anything to the discussion here

Accusing people of being shills is distracting away from the legitimate discussion itt

Pocket Ducks offers a fair point of view and isnt a shill


(This is what mods told me months ago when I was getting disgusted with PD and called him a shill)

Apparently some "important" people cant tell he is a shill/troll
*** NVG Low Content Thread: 1/3 less content than a regular NVG thread *** Quote
04-26-2016 , 08:54 PM
[ ] Paid shill

[x] Obsessive compulsive disorder or some other similar sort of mental illness.
*** NVG Low Content Thread: 1/3 less content than a regular NVG thread *** Quote
04-26-2016 , 09:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by xXPocketDucksXx
Guys, I think you're overlooking a possiility of who the real troll might be here - "funplayer", the account was made this month. His first post was against me in this thread, and so are all his subsequent posts. Even his posts seem a bit trolly to me, wouldn't expect a genuine new account to immediately find this thread and start bashing someone.
No one is questioning my integrity and no one ever does. What I am charged with is not being able to let go of the fact that you are a disingenuous poster by the very definition of the world. I am not a troll. I am a poster that does my best to bring value and content to the community.

I claim to be intelligent and I claim to be knowledgeable about the game in my domain. I cannot be charged with being disingenuous.

You are simultaneously claiming to be ignorant while spending an alarming amount of time carefully defining the difference between the reg and the rec view. You cannot claim ignorance and do this at the same time.

Quote:
Originally Posted by xXPocketDucksXx
Let's assume your account is genuine for a moment. The problem is you are only seeing this through "reg goggles". You are making out that anyone who plays in a game which is -EV is just "ignorant" or oblivious to the fact that they are losers in the game. But only a reg would think like this. Yes I'm well aware that the expectation of scratchcards is negative, but I still buy them from time to time (not very often, but I still do it). That doesn't mean I'm ignorant, I buy the scratchcards because I enjoy them and sometimes I'll get lucky and win something, or my friends might win something and if not then it's only $5 or whatever that I'll have lost.

Same with poker. Now I'm not sure what my EV is in these KO hypers or spin n gos because I haven't studied the game. But I may well be a -EV player after rake. But that doesn't mean they aren't fun to play every now and then. My flatmate's another example of someone who's very smart (top grades at 3rd year uni), but still gambles for fun. Regs looking through their one-sighted vision cannot see how it's possible that anyone with a brain would even buy scratchcards or other -EV games if they are aware it's -EV, well I'm smart and I still play these games for fun. Rec players are called recreational for a reason - they play poker as a recreational activity, a hobby/pastime for fun. Next you'll be approaching golfers and ice skaters and asking them about their hobby "why do you play these games? You're losing money from all the entry fees you pay, it's -EV!"
Tell me if you can admit, that given two games where all else is equal, wouldn't you rather play in the game with lower rake?

If you say you are indifferent I will ask why you don't play play money games....

Your image is inconsistent with itself sir. You have been exposed. You are describing a player archetype that is ignorant to the effects and purpose of rake, but in doing so you are perfectly admitting that you are well aware of these things yourself.

2p2, you are being manipulated.

Last edited by funplayer; 04-26-2016 at 09:28 PM.
*** NVG Low Content Thread: 1/3 less content than a regular NVG thread *** Quote
04-26-2016 , 09:42 PM
He's probably getting more attention here than he gets at home.

Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
*** NVG Low Content Thread: 1/3 less content than a regular NVG thread *** Quote
04-26-2016 , 10:06 PM
Dammit, just got here and saw the last infraction needed to make it a permaban was a slam dunk, and someone beat me to the PD ban. Ah well, at least it's done - all hail R*R! Now I can take care of the latest newguy/Nash gimmick, apparently created solely to "trap" PD.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vrael111
Wow this thread turned to absolute nut low. Thanks pocketducks
You should also thank all the people who kept feeding/arguing with him. Again and again and again.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AllBlackDan
Cmon now pontylad and everyone else, youre not adding anything to the discussion here

Accusing people of being shills is distracting away from the legitimate discussion itt

Pocket Ducks offers a fair point of view and isnt a shill


(This is what mods told me months ago when I was getting disgusted with PD and called him a shill)

Apparently some "important" people cant tell he is a shill/troll
Yeah, could be that he should've been banned earlier, but it's also true that the word "shill" is thrown around ridiculously often on our forums these days, to the point where it's pretty much lost all meaning.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
[ ] Paid shill

[x] Obsessive compulsive disorder or some other similar sort of mental illness.
Much more likely IMO.
*** NVG Low Content Thread: 1/3 less content than a regular NVG thread *** Quote
04-26-2016 , 10:16 PM
I'm hoping for a plot twist where funplayer turns out to be a gimmick account of PD.
*** NVG Low Content Thread: 1/3 less content than a regular NVG thread *** Quote
04-26-2016 , 11:09 PM
I'm glad PD has been banned. I actually didn't think any of the points he made were "wrong" per se (I agree with his point that not everyone who does -EV gambling is dumb) but it's just so annoying to read because that's not what these threads are about. Everyone from the thread wants the rake to be dropped (including myself), and he's basically trying to come up with reasons to keep increasing it. I don't believe he also genuinely stating those facts he comes up with for any reason other than to piss people off. So yea, good riddance.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett

[ ] Paid shill

[x] Obsessive compulsive disorder or some other similar sort of mental illness.

Much more likely IMO.
I do however feel you might be starting to tread into dangerous territory here, as with this comment it makes it look like you banned him primarily because of a mental condition you perceive him to have, which is in essence a form of discrimination. Like if you walk past someone with a disability on the street, you don't make fun of them/discriminate them. Same applies here. I agree PD well and truly deserved the ban, but I don't approve of this line of reasoning.
*** NVG Low Content Thread: 1/3 less content than a regular NVG thread *** Quote
04-26-2016 , 11:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by funplayer
There is nothing else to counter. You must not have understood:

Their entire persona is a troll. This has clearly been shown and they have exposed the truth themselves.
Still dont think he should be banned. Or you...but you will probably both be back. So are either of you really banned..

Quote:
I'm calling for a serious discussion among the regs, mods, admins, and owners.
No one is stopping that but the people not having serious discussion. Which can be had around a troll.

Quote:
The only reason a rational person could support this behaviors is if they were not aware of it.
Im ok with being irrational. Sometimes.
Quote:
The mods cannot just ban an opinion, even if its obviously wrong or bad. But this is a person that is clearly being disingenuous by the exact definition of the word.

The are 100% pure troll. And that is not allowed here.
I thought you were one for a long time, back when you crossed RGT's way. Didn't think you should of been banned either.

Last edited by batair; 04-26-2016 at 11:44 PM. Reason: Sorry to interrupt the discussion that was going to make stars rollback the changes. carry on.
*** NVG Low Content Thread: 1/3 less content than a regular NVG thread *** Quote
04-27-2016 , 12:08 AM
Quote:
Last edited by batair; Today at 10:44 PM. Reason: Sorry to interrupt the discussion that was going to make stars rollback the changes. carry on.
Well I certainly don't expect stars to ever rollback the changes, the only thing we can hope for now is that they stop increasing it any further. It's people like PD who are encouraging Stars to keep raising the rake by making out that "people don't care" (which is I guess partly true for the recs, but absolutely terribad for the regs). Either way, encouraging the biggest poker site to increase the rake isn't going to help anyone (albeit perhaps the site itself) so it is disruptive to the spirit of the poker community. This was why PD had to go.

I thought banning "funplayer" was possibly a bit unfair though, since although his posts weren't particularly constructive or useful, at least it was in good spirit of supporting the greater cause. Disclaimer: I haven't researched into this "funplayer" guy, so maybe the mods know more about this guy than I do (there might be some history with him that I'm not aware of).
*** NVG Low Content Thread: 1/3 less content than a regular NVG thread *** Quote

      
m