nutsinho tells kidpoker he still hasn't learned how to play poker - Page 5 - Poker News

mrrpb · 07-30-2010, 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fslexcduck

you've said this either twice or possibly three times in the thread and you've been wrong twice or possibly three times in the thread... if you say it again though, that might change... wanna give it a try?

You do have to love his 5-10% estimate that he pulled straight out of his arse though.

ceire · 07-30-2010, 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BustedNuts16

That being said. Shut up.

+1

billstraightener · 07-30-2010, 10:13 AM

DN, nutsinho, and vanessa posting in a nvg thread. Solid thread OP

borderline · 07-30-2010, 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrrpb

Thank you $6 HUSNG player for explaining to us exactly how DN should be playing in a NL20K game. Your in-depth analysis is much appreciated.

lol

You're a moron. The fundamentals of poker is the same at any level. You don't need someone who plays low stakes to tell you this. If you think DN has shown perfect fundamentals, please go away and delude yourself more.

mrrpb · 07-30-2010, 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by borderline

You're a moron. The fundamentals of poker is the same at any level. You don't need someone who plays low stakes to tell you this. If you think DN has shown perfect fundamentals, please go away and delude yourself more.

Careful now, you don't want to go and tilt and start blowing tens of dollars $6 at a time. Calm down there.

kolotoure · 07-30-2010, 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by borderline

You're a moron. The fundamentals of poker is the same at any level. You don't need someone who plays low stakes to tell you this. If you think DN has shown perfect fundamentals, please go away and delude yourself more.

not when there are dynamics you aren't good enough to understand . You have been wrong with pretty much every bit of hand analysis itt

fourfades · 07-30-2010, 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Negreanu

10,585 hands
+$194,151.30
bb/100 9.17

I know that's not a large sample size yet, but it's becoming more relevant by the day, and I'm not playing against suckers here. These guys are all really good so I'm proud of my results and how I'm playing. I've learned a ton.

Is there a math formula that you can use to calculate how accurate 10,585 hands is? For example could you say..this is X% accurate as to how i actually run.. When 2,000 hands would be Y% accurate, where Y was smaller than X obviously. Is there a way to find out the percentage of accuracy that your sample size is giving you at any given time.

Obviously it is clear that as your sample size gets bigger, your stats become more accurate, I was just wondering how people came up with the relevancy of different hand sample sizes.

kolotoure · 07-30-2010, 10:24 AM

there is (kinda) but you need to know his standard deviation

HopelessHousewife · 07-30-2010, 10:26 AM

lots of NL20K regs itt giving advices how to play hands.

toohigh · 07-30-2010, 10:28 AM

lol @ everyone wrt the 10k hands - i believe DN has publicly stated he knows it means nothing and all he's trying to do is show a profit after 50k hands

hope this helps good god this strat is making me wanna play

suckmychip · 07-30-2010, 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrrpb

Careful now, you don't want to go and tilt and start blowing tens of dollars $6 at a time. Calm down there.

timeforheroes · 07-30-2010, 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrrpb

You do have to love his 5-10% estimate that he pulled straight out of his arse though.

There is a 2.5% chance he has a straight. Then using the rule of 2 we multiply that to get 5%, and using the rule of 4 we multiply it to get 10%, then by using these two figures as percentage chances along a continuum like this:

Its important to note that Negreanu's straight doesnt lie exactly at 7.5%. This model should merely be used as a graphic illustration. In reality, much like an electron, we can never know exactly where Negreanu's straight lies, and the process of observing it makes it change position.

-Edit Graphic added.

DaveBirdel · 07-30-2010, 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timeforheroes

There is a 2.5% chance he has a straight. Then using the rule of 2 we multiply that to get 5%, then using the rule of 4 we multiply that to get 10%, then by using these two figures as percentage chances along a continuum like this:

Negreanu's straight
I
5%________________________________________________ ___10%

Its important to note that Negreanu's straight doesnt lie exactly at 7.5%. This model should merely be used as a graphic illustration. In reality, much like an electron, we can never know exactly where Negreanu's straight lies, and the process of observing it makes it change position.

-Edit I apologise, but I cant seem to get Negreanu's straight to lie at 7.5% mark.

It all makes sense now.

uter · 07-30-2010, 10:34 AM

i would recommend that the smart people in this thread not get entangled by the ******.

spankedtwice · 07-30-2010, 10:41 AM

why is this thread so off topic? nutsinho was drunk and talking ****.

/thread

Foldemlow · 07-30-2010, 11:00 AM

Daniel,

Any thoughts on the HR 2267 bill?

kcb · 07-30-2010, 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by revg

Nope....

From pokertableratings,

"Richard 'nutsinho' Lyndaker originally intended his screenname to have a Portuguese pronunciation (nut-seen-yo).

Weird, but this is how I always understood his screen name to be. It never even occurred to me it could be "nuts in ho", haha, but that's pretty funny too.

To expound a little bit, nutsinho literally translates to "Little Nuts".

3R1C W · 07-30-2010, 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by borderline

DN should never have a set after just calling the flop although it is possible 5-10% of the time.

Contradictions ITT. Also DN didn't have a set so it's possible 0% of the time DUCY?

Quad_me's · 07-30-2010, 11:10 AM

dunno what you 2p2 degens really want.

DN says he has a long way to go and wants to learn. He has admitted internet pro's are better. He is very nice to almost everyone. He is VERY good for the game. He is also been a large part of building the poker name.

Haters gonna Hate.

LovedBySgtSaLT · 07-30-2010, 11:22 AM

bb/100 9.17
sustainable

Quote:

Originally Posted by timeforheroes

this should be the official "LOL-strategy-in-NVG"-pic

Bruut99 · 07-30-2010, 11:30 AM

I am also skeptic abouts daniels ability in NLHE 6max cashgame, altough it seems that he is improving. I would be very impressed if he shows an profit after 50k hands against these sick line ups. Oh and if this is not a level, its really really sad getting drunk and acting like a fool.

keanosdog · 07-30-2010, 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bruut99

I am also skeptic abouts daniels ability in NLHE 6max cashgame, altough it seems that he is improving. I would be very impressed if he shows an profit after 50k hands against these sick line ups. Oh and if this is not a level, its really really sad getting drunk and acting like a fool.

I act like this in 10$ PLO all the time.

i'm currently reading EOP

Ditch Digger · 07-30-2010, 11:39 AM

If that's the worst hand DN has played then he seems to be doing fine.

reverie · 07-30-2010, 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timeforheroes

Its important to note that Negreanu's straight doesnt lie exactly at 7.5%. This model should merely be used as a graphic illustration. In reality, much like an electron, we can never know exactly where Negreanu's straight lies, and the process of observing it makes it change position.

way to coach people nosebleed strat for free.

exoendo · 07-30-2010, 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Negreanu

Yes, it's true I whip out some weird plays. I'm learning and trying out new things and sometimes they are really bad and come off stupid and illogical. I'm aware of that.

I don't think the hand against nutsinho was all that weird. Maybe I'm supposed to fold before the flop, but if felt like we were deep enough to make the call in position 250 bbs deep with 79 suited. After that, I guess I could have raised the flop but I planned on raising a lot of turns if I missed. Turn was great, giving me more outs so it seemed like I had to take a shot at it then and hope he folds a big pair. He made a great read, I hit one of my 15 outs. Doesn't seem like I played it atrocious or anything.

10,585 hands
+$194,151.30
bb/100 9.17

I know that's not a large sample size yet, but it's becoming more relevant by the day, and I'm not playing against suckers here. These guys are all really good so I'm proud of my results and how I'm playing. I've learned a ton.

daniel don't sweat any of this it all just all boils down to: