nutsinho tells kidpoker he still hasn't learned how to play poker - Page 5 - Poker News

you've said this either twice or possibly three times in the thread and you've been wrong twice or possibly three times in the thread... if you say it again though, that might change... wanna give it a try?

You do have to love his 5-10% estimate that he pulled straight out of his arse though.

Quote

07-30-2010 , 10:09 AM

#102

ceire

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 7,541

Quote:

Originally Posted by BustedNuts16

That being said. Shut up.

Quote

07-30-2010 , 10:13 AM

#103

billstraightener

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 4,081

DN, nutsinho, and vanessa posting in a nvg thread. Solid thread OP

Quote

07-30-2010 , 10:16 AM

#104

borderline

banned

Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 4,356

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrrpb

Thank you $6 HUSNG player for explaining to us exactly how DN should be playing in a NL20K game. Your in-depth analysis is much appreciated.

lol

You're a moron. The fundamentals of poker is the same at any level. You don't need someone who plays low stakes to tell you this. If you think DN has shown perfect fundamentals, please go away and delude yourself more.

Quote

07-30-2010 , 10:17 AM

#105

mrrpb

banned

Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 3,592

Quote:

Originally Posted by borderline

Careful now, you don't want to go and tilt and start blowing tens of dollars $6 at a time. Calm down there.

Quote

07-30-2010 , 10:18 AM

#106

kolotoure

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 15,858

Quote:

Originally Posted by borderline

not when there are dynamics you aren't good enough to understand . You have been wrong with pretty much every bit of hand analysis itt

Quote

07-30-2010 , 10:18 AM

#107

fourfades

centurion

Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 115

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Negreanu

10,585 hands
+$194,151.30
bb/100 9.17

I know that's not a large sample size yet, but it's becoming more relevant by the day, and I'm not playing against suckers here. These guys are all really good so I'm proud of my results and how I'm playing. I've learned a ton.

Is there a math formula that you can use to calculate how accurate 10,585 hands is? For example could you say..this is X% accurate as to how i actually run.. When 2,000 hands would be Y% accurate, where Y was smaller than X obviously. Is there a way to find out the percentage of accuracy that your sample size is giving you at any given time.

Obviously it is clear that as your sample size gets bigger, your stats become more accurate, I was just wondering how people came up with the relevancy of different hand sample sizes.

Quote

07-30-2010 , 10:24 AM

#108

kolotoure

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 15,858

there is (kinda) but you need to know his standard deviation

Quote

07-30-2010 , 10:26 AM

#109

HopelessHousewife

old hand

Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 1,253

lots of NL20K regs itt giving advices how to play hands.

Quote

07-30-2010 , 10:28 AM

#110

toohigh

veteran

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 2,543

lol @ everyone wrt the 10k hands - i believe DN has publicly stated he knows it means nothing and all he's trying to do is show a profit after 50k hands

hope this helps good god this strat is making me wanna play

Quote

07-30-2010 , 10:29 AM

#111

suckmychip

journeyman

Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 283

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrrpb

Careful now, you don't want to go and tilt and start blowing tens of dollars $6 at a time. Calm down there.

Quote

07-30-2010 , 10:31 AM

#112

timeforheroes

old hand

Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 1,899

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrrpb

You do have to love his 5-10% estimate that he pulled straight out of his arse though.

There is a 2.5% chance he has a straight. Then using the rule of 2 we multiply that to get 5%, and using the rule of 4 we multiply it to get 10%, then by using these two figures as percentage chances along a continuum like this:

Its important to note that Negreanu's straight doesnt lie exactly at 7.5%. This model should merely be used as a graphic illustration. In reality, much like an electron, we can never know exactly where Negreanu's straight lies, and the process of observing it makes it change position.

-Edit Graphic added.

Last edited by timeforheroes; 07-30-2010 at 10:50 AM.

Quote

07-30-2010 , 10:34 AM

#113

DaveBirdel

centurion

Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 133

Quote:

Originally Posted by timeforheroes

There is a 2.5% chance he has a straight. Then using the rule of 2 we multiply that to get 5%, then using the rule of 4 we multiply that to get 10%, then by using these two figures as percentage chances along a continuum like this:

Negreanu's straight
I
5%________________________________________________ ___10%

Its important to note that Negreanu's straight doesnt lie exactly at 7.5%. This model should merely be used as a graphic illustration. In reality, much like an electron, we can never know exactly where Negreanu's straight lies, and the process of observing it makes it change position.

-Edit I apologise, but I cant seem to get Negreanu's straight to lie at 7.5% mark.

It all makes sense now.

Quote

07-30-2010 , 10:34 AM

#114

uter

banned

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 1,417

i would recommend that the smart people in this thread not get entangled by the ******.

Quote

07-30-2010 , 10:41 AM

#115

spankedtwice

old hand

Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 1,728

why is this thread so off topic? nutsinho was drunk and talking ****.

/thread

Quote

07-30-2010 , 11:00 AM

#116

Foldemlow

banned

Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 1,716

Daniel,

Any thoughts on the HR 2267 bill?

Quote

07-30-2010 , 11:09 AM

#117

kcb

old hand

Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 1,673

Quote:

Originally Posted by revg

Nope....

From pokertableratings,

"Richard 'nutsinho' Lyndaker originally intended his screenname to have a Portuguese pronunciation (nut-seen-yo).

Weird, but this is how I always understood his screen name to be. It never even occurred to me it could be "nuts in ho", haha, but that's pretty funny too.

To expound a little bit, nutsinho literally translates to "Little Nuts".

Quote

07-30-2010 , 11:10 AM

#118

3R1C W

journeyman

Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 374

Quote:

Originally Posted by borderline

DN should never have a set after just calling the flop although it is possible 5-10% of the time.

Contradictions ITT. Also DN didn't have a set so it's possible 0% of the time DUCY?

Quote

07-30-2010 , 11:10 AM

#119

Quad_me's

veteran

Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 3,061

dunno what you 2p2 degens really want.

DN says he has a long way to go and wants to learn. He has admitted internet pro's are better. He is very nice to almost everyone. He is VERY good for the game. He is also been a large part of building the poker name.

Haters gonna Hate.

Quote

07-30-2010 , 11:22 AM

#120

LovedBySgtSaLT

veteran

Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 2,536

bb/100 9.17
sustainable

Quote:

Originally Posted by timeforheroes

this should be the official "LOL-strategy-in-NVG"-pic

Quote

07-30-2010 , 11:30 AM

#121

Bruut99

veteran

Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 2,819

I am also skeptic abouts daniels ability in NLHE 6max cashgame, altough it seems that he is improving. I would be very impressed if he shows an profit after 50k hands against these sick line ups. Oh and if this is not a level, its really really sad getting drunk and acting like a fool.

Quote

07-30-2010 , 11:39 AM

#122

keanosdog

adept

Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 865

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bruut99

I act like this in 10$ PLO all the time.

i'm currently reading EOP

Quote

07-30-2010 , 11:39 AM

#123

Ditch Digger

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 9,989

If that's the worst hand DN has played then he seems to be doing fine.

Quote

07-30-2010 , 11:39 AM

#124

reverie

adept

Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 1,000

Quote:

Originally Posted by timeforheroes

way to coach people nosebleed strat for free.

Quote

07-30-2010 , 01:07 PM

#125

exoendo

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 5,583

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Negreanu

Yes, it's true I whip out some weird plays. I'm learning and trying out new things and sometimes they are really bad and come off stupid and illogical. I'm aware of that.

I don't think the hand against nutsinho was all that weird. Maybe I'm supposed to fold before the flop, but if felt like we were deep enough to make the call in position 250 bbs deep with 79 suited. After that, I guess I could have raised the flop but I planned on raising a lot of turns if I missed. Turn was great, giving me more outs so it seemed like I had to take a shot at it then and hope he folds a big pair. He made a great read, I hit one of my 15 outs. Doesn't seem like I played it atrocious or anything.

10,585 hands
+$194,151.30
bb/100 9.17

I know that's not a large sample size yet, but it's becoming more relevant by the day, and I'm not playing against suckers here. These guys are all really good so I'm proud of my results and how I'm playing. I've learned a ton.

daniel don't sweat any of this it all just all boils down to:

Quote

Page 5 of 12

First

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Last

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 5 of 12

First

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Last