Quote:
Originally Posted by madlex
3. I couldn't care less about your goals and dreams. Poker or otherwise.
.
Understood. But, why would you want to be a moderator on a poker forum, then?
This desire to see "less winning players" and help lesser skilled players the industry as a whole seems to have is very strange.
Do you go around to Casinos teaching degens better Black Jack strategy, too? Help out the old ladies on the slots?
People are doing all kinds of wagering in all kinds of situations where they're statistical long shots and nobody at these companies are stepping in to alter the situation and "improve" things for the losing players. They're actually giving they're customers free alcohol in many situations and intoxicating them while they do their wagering.
It's very weird the poker industry has so many people at the top looking to handicap other players at the top, or seeing it as a benefit to do so. Other companies that manage different forms of gambling seem to treat players as a whole with more respect and leave them alone. Unless of course, they're asking them if they need a refill on they're drink. Which, is how a company should treat a consenting adult while they make their bets.
It's not exactly marketable to decrease the number of winning players in the game. As much as you believe the stats show that it is. Lesser skilled players don't want to see successful players handicapped and decreased in volume. That defeats the purpose of logging on and playing the game.
Why would recs be encouraged to log on and play when they hear the chances of success have been drastically decreased? You poker pros and executives need to learn how to market the game better. I think your logic is severely flawed and it's hurting the game terribly. I get the point you're trying to make. That less sharks are more friendly to recs, but I don't think the recs will perceive what you intend for them to perceive. I think they'll equate less sharks to less chances of success and refrain from logging on at all.
What you guys are promoting is bad for the game. It's not marketable to tell lesser skilled players that they're so bad at the game that it's good for them to see more successful players chased off by the companies altering the game, or government taxation. All that means for them is that they're is less of a chance of being successful and that the extent of the success is much more limited.
Last edited by DSL32; 04-24-2018 at 01:45 PM.