Quote:
Originally Posted by NerdSuperfly
the All-In insurance is a game against the bank.
Good point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NerdSuperfly
i've read the 888 email and i noticed bad wording, i also know 888poker isn't the best in organising things so there's a chance this is really a miscommunication ... but still it's concerning.
Sorry if already mentioned, but 888 have since clarified (here in their official thread, i believe) that they will not be segregated player pool.
Quote:
the "5 second rule" is definitely a thing for the casino games.
Agree.
Quote:
4 table rule seem to be global and not per domain (a domain is basically one operator), but i don't see any chance the state can enforce this. at least not right away.
The 4 table rule I believe is per operator and specific to poker in these interim rules. However the Treaty requires that operators all register activity in a central database
to prevent a player from playing simultaneously across operators. This seems like a total non-starter to me; technically difficult to implement, probably contrary to loads of privacy issues etc.
Quote:
no idea about the rake, but IF the DE-client is connected to the COM/EU pool, i can't see why a DE player pays more. of course they can cut promos, but not sure.
Yeah like we've seen in other shared player pools, it will be same rake, reduced rewards, to pay for the increase in gambling tax.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NerdSuperfly
i'm too tired atm, but another thing i wouldn't sure about are Spins (or similar games at other platforms) and grand tour. both have randomized prizes involved. while players don't play against a banker, the house is involved.
anyway, just a late afternoon thought. unless the all-in insurance, which is imo clearly a game vs the house, this isn't as clear
Good points.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NerdSuperfly
can't imagine that winamax would handle DE-players for the PT/ES/FR pool. not even sure if this is legal, but even if so, it's prolly not worth the effort.
I think DE would have to sign the shared liquidity agreement signed by FRESPT for it to be feasible.