Quote:
Originally Posted by OhEllNo
ok but in this case why do we never see 400K jackpot ?
Because so far, someone has won it before it's ever reached 400 K, of course. That doesn't change the point at which playing is +EV.
I have no idea if the calculations are right, but pointing at the time a number of jackpots have been won as being proof that they're incorrect is silly. Just like if you were dealt AA 10 times in 1500 hands, that doesn't mean the odds of being dealt AA aren't 1 in 220.
If you see an error in the math, you should post it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OhEllNo
and why the first thing people wanted to know was the EV neutral number if its worth nothing to know ?
Yeah, pretty sure now you have no idea what "EV neutral number" even means.