Quote:
Originally Posted by illdonk
I’m not sure why you think any of that is a mitigating factor.
The dealer made a movement:joke which had the OP wondering whether his cards were actually shown or whether the other player made a correct read. They’re both bad. The ambiguity is actually worse.
I guess we can argue whether it was incompetence or deliberate unprofessionalism, but either way it isn’t good.
Those factors go to credibility, which is not to attack OP's sincere belief, just whether his recounting was accurate.
With due respect to the OP, maybe what he described was nothing more than the dealer talking a bit too loosely, but
not flashing cards and the adverse player trying to get a reaction from OP by "naming" his cards after folding.
Poker is defined by ambiguity. Seriously, you've never seen someone who folded fishing for information after a hand by supposedly "naming" the other guy's hole cards ?
Things are not always as described by one observer.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rashomon ,which is not a poker movie, but is a great film:
"The film is known for a plot device that involves various characters providing subjective, alternative, self-serving and contradictory versions of the same incident. Rashomon marked the entrance of Japanese film onto the world stage;[2][3] it won several awards, including the Golden Lion at the Venice Film Festival in 1951, and an Academy Honorary Award at the 24th Academy Awards in 1952, and is now considered one of the greatest films ever made."