Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
My Response to Blackmail Allegations + Assorted UB Comments My Response to Blackmail Allegations + Assorted UB Comments

03-23-2011 , 04:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by txpstwx
If this did happen, is it possible for them to tell the truth? Naming names of current/former owners etc.? I'm not sure it is.
Not quite sure what you're asking...

Also, why did you FMP to spell "you're" wrong?
03-23-2011 , 04:26 AM
Have you ever seen an NVGtard spell "you're" correctly?

Anyway, what I'm saying is.. He possibly works for and with the names that will be mentioned. I don't see how he could possibly out them.

If someone were able to provide undeniable facts, it would be different, but then they wouldn't be questions we would need answered.
03-23-2011 , 04:28 AM
Glad to see Joe Sebok posting here in response to the controversy. Dialog is good.
03-23-2011 , 04:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mason Malmuth
Joe:

He should answer them here. 2+2 is where the poker community is, and since it's important that as many people as possible get the correct answers, that's why you started this thread isn't it? this is obviously the place to do it.

We could also probably set up an interview on our 2+2 PokerCast. Mike and Adam are the best in the business (and I assume they would be okay with the interview), and I can assure you that the interview will be done in a completely professional manner, but the tough questions will be asked.

By the way Joe, if this isn't acceptable, then my suggestion would be for you to reconsider your participation here. After all, you're representing Ultimate Bet, and by coming to 2+2 are reaching as many people in the poker community as possible.

Mason
I think this would be the best way to go. And even have Haley and mookman on the line also asking questions. I love the pokercast, but I'm sure both Mike and Adam agree with me that Haley and mookman know a lot more and know a lot more in detail compared to Mike and Adam.

(also, there might be some chance that Haley could ask a question or two, which information has not yet been disclosed to other 2+2 members).

Last edited by KidsJH; 03-23-2011 at 04:39 AM.
03-23-2011 , 04:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by txpstwx
Have you ever seen an NVGtard spell "you're" correctly?
lol

Quote:
Anyway, what I'm saying is.. He possibly works for and with the names that will be mentioned. I don't see how he could possibly out them.

If someone were able to provide undeniable facts, it would be different, but then they wouldn't be questions we would need answered.
I don't think a UB rep is going to come one twoplustwo and admit to tons of wrongdoing out of nowhere.

However, if there are specific things Haley, mook, or others have alleged that are not true, a UB rep should be in the position to provide evidence that that is the case. If they can't, and can't provide good reasons why they can't, that's pretty damning. That's why asking them these questions should be interesting.
03-23-2011 , 04:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KidsJH
I think this would be the best way to go. And even have Haley and mookman on the line also asking questions. I love the pokercast, but I'm sure both Mike and Adam agree with me that Haley and mookman know a lot more and know a lot more in detail compared to Mike and Adam.

(also, there might be some chance that Haley could ask a question or two that has not yet been disclosed to other 2+2 members).
i think an openended, written dialogue would be much better. something like an NVG thread that only an approved list of a dozen people or so can post in. it's too easy to dodge questions, provide half answers, and promise to look into things in a real time, spoken interview.
03-23-2011 , 04:45 AM
How can you put your head on the line for a company that has the horrific history that UB has yet you only "believe that the current ownership is different from the former ownership"

If I was going to take a load of flack for representing the cancer of online poker I would "Know" the management was different otherwise I'd be going elsewhere.

Oh F UB too
03-23-2011 , 04:55 AM
Im suprised at the lack of NVGtardedness in this thread. You guys must be monitoring it pretty heavily.

Why not do something like post a couple questions per day (obv people like haley, grover etc. would be asking the questions) and make the thread for everybody to be able to read? Maybe a seperate thread open to everybody for question suggestions or whatever.

Example would be the current UB scandal thread where only kevmath can edit and write posts, cept you extend the amount of people to whoever.
03-23-2011 , 04:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ike
i think an openended, written dialogue would be much better. something like an NVG thread that only an approved list of a dozen people or so can post in...
I think this would be a good format for it. What is our expectation level though? There is only so much that he could probably address from a legal perspective.
03-23-2011 , 04:59 AM
I just fail to understand why you wanna represent them. After the cheating scandal the brand will always be dead. It doesnt matter even if 100 % of the current management are all saints - The. Brand. Is. Dead! Even God cannot revive it.

When it comes to the DM it was pathetic which you apologized for. Case closed. We all do stupid stuff when we get emotional so thats fine.
03-23-2011 , 04:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Men"the master"fan
I think this would be a good format for it. What is our expectation level though? There is only so much that he could probably address from a legal perspective.
I really don't know. Get it started, see where it goes. If there's anything they're willing to talk about there will be interesting questions to ask. If it ends with Legget or whoever else UB appoints to the task just stonewalling and refusing to comment on anything, I don't think anyone is worse off than they currently are.
03-23-2011 , 05:01 AM
I want xyz answers, but Sebok does not give me xyz but claimed to find out and expose xyz when he signed. Now he says 'we' berate him for not having xyz answers, but did he not promise to find such answers for the community? Don't make promises you can't keep, don't try to play victim, don't try to please everyone. Man the **** up.
03-23-2011 , 05:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RosieTheGreat
IWhy not do something like post a couple questions per day (obv people like haley, grover etc. would be asking the questions) and make the thread for everybody to be able to read? Maybe a seperate thread open to everybody for question suggestions or whatever.

Example would be the current UB scandal thread where only kevmath can edit and write posts, cept you extend the amount of people to whoever.
This is exactly what I'm suggesting as well, in case I wasn't clear.
03-23-2011 , 05:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sockhead2
Joe,

If people are ragging on you in this thread, the mods must be deleting it before I get a chance to read it. But yet, I still see more of your apprehension about posting on 2+2 than answering any of the well thought out questions.

I don't want to pry into your business or financial arrangements with UB, but if you in any way consider it a part of your job or mission to get to the bottom of the cheating allegations and clear your company (or unmask something damning and prove they are dirty), how can you not take a week or a day to spend some time pouring over the allegations and evidence on 2+2 (and other online outlets), and find the answers to them?

Maybe I totally misunderstand what your job is and what you were hired to do, but responses to the effect of "that's a good question, I wish I knew the answer" just blow my mind! Paul denied a cover-up, you later said they made a big mistake and they know it by committing a cover-up. What exactly did they do? --I'm just pulling that out of the many many questions, as an example, because as a totally naive outsider, I just can't imagine how you could a.) not know, and b.) think that shrugging your shoulders closes the book on that kind of question. It seems imminently knowable. It doesn't require you to divine the true nature of anyone's heart, it doesn't require you to be in contact with cheaters who are allegedly no longer associated with the company; it just requires you talking with the current management and getting a run down of the mistakes they made / cover-up efforts they made. Is that really impossible for you to do?

I am left shaking my head and wondering what is really going on. You ask over and over for everyone to cut you some slack - not here, but in interviews - and you hear from people over and over how terrible 2+2 is... You know you can read 2+2 without joining, right? You could still cull it for relevant facts and good questions to send up the ladder to Paul or whomever. Anyone who is even slightly observant reading this thread will see that you are ignoring or dodging all of the substantive questions. So your fear that posting on 2+2 will make things worse seems like a bit of a self-fulfilling prophecy if you can't just shut up about your apprehensions, ignore any potential stupid questions or idiots posting garbage, and really dig into the meaty questions that are being asked, often after having been posed to you on your own forum years ago.

Also, we get it - you don't think you were blackmailing Jon, and you don't think Jon thinks so either deep down. The reason it makes you look stupid is because, think about this, having implied now that you actually do have some dirt on Jon's girlfriend: if you had intended to blackmail him, how could you have done it? Guess what, you could have done it by writing the exact same message you wrote. It implies the threat, but is non-threatening enough that you could argue later, if you ever needed to, that it was just a poor choice of words. Get it? So I don't know what you meant; you want us to believe it was not a thread, fine. Whatever. Let's move on. But seriously you must acknowledge to yourself, if no one else that a blackmailer doesn't start a blackmail letter by writing, "Hello Jon, I will be your blackmailer today." they start it by writing something indistinguishable from what you wrote.
I would like to know the answer to this as well. Everyone at the "new" UB claims they want to clean up the company name, but nobody is making any effort to address the serious allegations that continue to come up here on a nearly week-to-week basis.

How can you honestly expect us to cut you some slack when you make zero noticeable effort to actually work with the community here to clear things up?

If you are serious about actually doing something to help the UB image in the community, you will do what Ike is asking and make an effort to communicate with the community here on 2p2.
03-23-2011 , 05:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSebok
i encourage everyone to read Haley's latest "just conjecturin'" post. it's not like i can personally go and examine the servers and understand if hands are missing or not, but it's very reasonable to believe the previous regime deleted some in order to protect certain individuals that may (or may not) have been part of the scandal.

http://haleyspokerblog.blogspot.com/
why did UB tell the poker community everyone was refunded in full based on the HH then when asked to provide the HH with you leading the charge Joe admit 2 years later 10% of the HH were gone due to server crash and now you site Haley that the real reason the HH are gone is b/c Peirson had the HH deleted ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JSebok
i do not. i wish i had more to release. i really do. we uncovered many names in the wickedchops piece we did, http://wickedchopspoker.com/the-ulti...candal-part-i/

i think part of the problem is that people want the names to be sexier perhaps? Annie, Phil, etc, but we never found anything to support that. we released everything that we did find.
with or without UB cooperation ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JSebok
i wish that i could possibly know everything that happens at ub, but that just isn't possible. i am a sponsored pro who has attempted to get as involved in the business as i can. i don't think it's fair to think i could know every detail about how the company is run.
no one expects a Rep to know everything but for gosh sakes can you at least find out to your own satisfaction who the owners of Avione are so at least you can tell us " I know for a fact who the owners of Avione are and there are no cheaters among them" would go a long way to boosting your credibility Joe

Quote:
Originally Posted by JSebok
we would all be much more likely to answer questions in that kind of situation. I'm just going out on a limb here, in hopes it can do some good, against most advice i've been given. i'm hopeful tho.
you didn't go out on a limb you are doing the right thing but if you don't know an answer can you at least make the effort to please find out and get back to us ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by snagglepuss
just a minor derail but i want to address joe seboks lies in this post:

point *1*
-i never lied about anything. joe, of course, was the liar. he lied on his public radio show. he called me a liar. i proved him wrong of course:
-this is the thread in question and that is the post in which i provided proof i was correct. boring cliffs:
-thread about sebok being terrible
-i post anecdote about completely terrible sebok hand at my table i witnessed
-joe lies about the hand
-joe calls me a liar publicly
-i prove him wrong, as evidenced above
-joe never apologizes (obv) and then calls me a liar in this thread! (lol)


point *2*
-i have never made any sort of threatening tweet towards joe sebok.

-i have called him a douche and a liar on this forum.

-the following are my only tweets referencing joesebok lifetime:

and

no threats whatsoever. so what are you talking about?

nice to see you can't even manage to keep from lying in this thread.

now, get back to practicing avoidance on literally every legitimate question in this thread.

you are morally bankrupt.
ouch

Quote:
Originally Posted by ike
It's sorta beside the point, but you really are misusing the word. A shill pretends not to be associated with the business they are promoting. That's the defining characteristic of a shill.
gotta go with Ike here

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eponymous
And lol at Joe's response to UB's use of shills being that he'll send an e-mail to Paul that basically says that in his opinion, "mmmm, drugs are bad, m'kay?"


Quote:
Originally Posted by SleepyLaBeef
Uh... you work for Paul, right? So... go ask him, then come back in here, and tell them to us. We'll be waiting.
you cant expect UB to publicly disclose company info but they can disclose to Joe and Joe testify to the poker community - like Barryg said Joe may be naive but hes not a lair

Quote:
Originally Posted by DesertCat

what possessed him in the first place to bring her into any conversation.
especially a girl this cute


Quote:
Originally Posted by Topset72
I am another person who has not read the total thread -- is it called grunged -- but in his donkdown interview Mike Mad said he thought the new UB management was clean.
Mikie has to otherwise he couldn't take UB affiliate money and ads

Quote:
Originally Posted by JSebok
i will urge him to do so. i hope it will help, as i always do. i will attempt to get him to and also to set it up if he does agree.

my fear is that if he says anything other than, "you're right. we are liars and crooks" though that he will simply be called a liar. because of this he will probably be told not to do so, just as i was told not to come here initially.
Joe tell Leggett to MAN UP this is the place that busted the UB cheating wide open or it would be continuing to this day common brah a forum is not a gotcha interview take 2 days to answer if you have to

Last edited by RolloTomasi; 03-23-2011 at 05:17 AM.
03-23-2011 , 05:30 AM
The longer UB stays open and the longer all this can be dragged out the more money they are all making. It's only still around because of the unique catch 22 dynamic of poker, educated players leaving means higher concentration of fish, attracts back educated players.

If this happened to any other company they would be dragged through the courts and would be starved of any income pretty quickly from the public.

I think what would be best for the poker community is to completely amputate them, have them shut down and chase anyone legally responsible, and then working on repairing what damage they caused. Being constantly strung along by management only serves them, nothing good can ever come of it. They've had their chance(s) to come clean and repeatedly failed to. It's a complete and utter dismal failure. I don't trust any of them, and with good reasons.

There is pretty much nothing I could ever read or hear from anyone associated with UB to change this anymore.
03-23-2011 , 05:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSebok
i do not. i wish i had more to release. i really do. we uncovered many names in the wickedchops piece we did, http://wickedchopspoker.com/the-ulti...candal-part-i/

i think part of the problem is that people want the names to be sexier perhaps? Annie, Phil, etc, but we never found anything to support that. we released everything that we did find.

"However, neither Phil nor Annie now has regular contact with Greg Pierson."

quote is from the link.... at what time period is this know?
03-23-2011 , 05:42 AM
I apologize the interruption but could somebody facilitate the link to Brad Booth´s latest interview ? thx
03-23-2011 , 05:43 AM
Joe,

You admitted on the Cardrunners Podcast that you don't know who the current owners of UB are.

How do you know that you're not working for the same people who cheated thousands of 2+2 members? Just because Paul tells you so?

Haley and other reliable sources have posted that they have conclusive evidence that the AP cheaters own current UB. Given that you keep hearing this, why aren't you demanding that Leggett show you proof of who owns UB? Perhaps because you don't want to find out the truth?

It seems that you purposely stay ignorant so you can just say "I don't know" to the tough questions and not be pressured into keeping your word to quit.

Feel free to ignore these questions just like you have done with Mookman and just about everyone else who has asked you anything substantial.
03-23-2011 , 05:46 AM
btw joe i wasnt saying that paul should disclose cereus' owners to 2p2- just saying u should ask him to do that to you personally (and give your word u wont repeat it). Then u can see for urself if you think the story adds up. I personally think that in this case we (me/u mebbe not public) have similar information and ur not evaluating it right- but i could be wrong and id love for u to have more information and then tell people what you think instead of being fed either vry poorly supported truth, or- (more likely imo) company propaganda.
03-23-2011 , 05:47 AM
Trying to clear up your accusation of blackmail and then saying this

Quote:
Originally Posted by JSebok
jon, i am perfectly happy to let everyone know why i brought up your gf. that's your call. you know exactly why i mentioned her.

that's your business.
is just pure comedy
03-23-2011 , 05:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ike
i think an openended, written dialogue would be much better. something like an NVG thread that only an approved list of a dozen people or so can post in. it's too easy to dodge questions, provide half answers, and promise to look into things in a real time, spoken interview.
After considering your method, I agree that would be the way to go. I'm sure it wouldn't be hard to set-up a thread or subforum where only a number of people can post.

I think the hard part of it all would be to get UB representative on board with this.

Shall wait to see what happens...
03-23-2011 , 06:01 AM
Emailed UB/AP politely requesting attention to a possible dialogue (outlined by Joe and Moderators) to be worked out. Sort of like constituents mass writing their elected officials, although the relationship isn't the same in this case.

I don't think it couldn't hurt for any UB/AP players to do the same. My email reads this, if you cerus players want to use it as a template:
Dear Sir or Madam,

I'd like to first extend my appreciation as a customer for the service I've received from Ultimate Bet and Absolute Poker in the past 2 years. Payment processing, support emails, etc. have been followed up and all my needs have been addressed each time. So to the current employee or manager reading this: thank you.

I'm also taking this opportunity to make a request: please forward this email to those in higher management roles until it reaches an appropriate destination.
Joe Sebok recently opened dialogue amongst a portion of the "poker community" on the popular internet forum "twoplustwo". Joe managed to reach out to the forum moderators who are willing to arrange a controlled dialogue between UltimateBet ownership (read: Paul Leggett) and journalists who continue to investigate the ongoing controversy at UB/AP following the superuser scandals of '07 & '08.
I am not a constituent, and you are not an elected official. But I am writing because it is important to me not only as a customer and supporter of the Cerus Network, but as a soon-to-be manager with my own employer. I have it on good faith that Joe is doing what he can to get Paul Leggett's attention, but please find a way to inform Mr. Leggett that at least one more customer is concerned.


Much sincerity,

[My name]
03-23-2011 , 06:02 AM
First thing's first, fair play for posting and for the unreserved apology to Fatal Error. Of course doesn't excuse what you did, and don't really think you had much choice after it was aired here, but nevertheless I still doff my cap to you.

However -

Quote:
Originally Posted by billstraightener
just post the ****** hand histories already
Oh, and loving the built-in future disclaimer that is point 4: -

4. And yes, I believe that the current ownership is different from the former ownership. I have also heard constant claims that this is not so. Again, any proof of these claims would be great to see if it exists. I don't believe that it does. Of course, I am putting a great deal of faith in the current owners/management with making these claims, but that's what most of us do with our employers, and I am doing the same. Obviously if this were ever to be proven to be not true, I would feel duped.
03-23-2011 , 06:03 AM
Quote:
i could never touch the amount of time that haley, mook, etc have put into it.
What? Seriously? Let's be clear on this. Haley, mook and others are investigating the cheating and coming up with new information about what happened. That's what you said you were going to do. They are doing your job. In their spare time. Without inside access to UB's information like you have.

But you "can't touch the time" they spend on it? I need to repeat this it's so incredible, you don't have the time to do your job that other people do in their spare hours. What do you do all day?

      
m