Quote:
Originally Posted by Alobar
The everyman angle is massively over rated, especially back then as everyone with a penis already fancied themselves as good at poker naturally, because it had always been romanticized as a mans mans game, and ego is what makes the poker world run, especially before anyone knew anything about the game, which is how it was in ye olden days of early 2000s. They didn't need some random unknown to win to think "hey that could be, Im going to play poker now!", they just needed a bunch of hype and an accessible way to play poker. The holecard cam brought the hype in the form of increased TV coverage, and online brought the accessibility.
If moneymaker had busted out way earlier and Harrington had won, not a lot would have changed. Poker was on the way up, and with poke what it is, some random donk was going to win.
Moneymaker was probably the perfect random donk to win, because he was a likeable guy and his last name gave all the hack journalists an easy story (which definitely helped the hype), but the boom was inevitable even if pros dominated every ME
Having been in the online business for a few years prior to Moneymaker's win, and watching the industry like a hawk back then, through the Raymer win the next year, I can tell you the boom was a direct result of the combination of three factors,
a. "everyman" winning the Main Event,
b.
after having qualified online after buying into a satellite for $40
c. Moneymaker's last name was a big factor as well, just made for mainstream media to grab on to.
Yes, the online poker industry was already trending up from Spring 2001 about when UB, Party and Stars had launched, due to television coverage , but it literally took off thereafter.