Quote:
Originally Posted by MakeBelieve
the proof is probably that the 18k thing wasnt disputed at all by Young. Atleast I dont think ive seen that. So if its bull**** why wouldnt he say so?
Well it appears to me that JY has not confronted many if any of MM assertions but simply makes his case with these two contentions:
1. MM lost, so he automatically owes him the money (the actual amount is in dispute though, so perhaps that would need some independent arbitration to resolve); and
2. That MM gave him a promise at Vegas that he would be paid back to which MM has since then failed to respond to as to its accuracy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Young
Did you or did you not tell me in vegas you were going to pay me in full you were sorry for the delay and you were working on a staking deal that was going to get you some $ and you would be able to take care of me with that.
Just tell the truth...its rather simple
And it should also be said that after JY made this assertion about the promise, MM started to call for private arbitration. Is that an implicit reading of guilt?