Quote:
Originally Posted by rickroll
can someone give cliffs on the video, it was made private so can't be seen anymore
In no order:
- Mike Postle didn't serve the lawsuit (only filed it) so shouldn't be held accountable for people having to move to strike the complaint
- he is still defamed, harassed, all over the internet and real life
- Mike Postle massive victim because the people he sued hired lawyers when they didn't have to and its not fair they are using the law on his own lawsuit against them
- he is without a lawyer and his other lawyers left because of countless ill timed deaths and medical emergencies
- again he should not be held accountable for his lawsuit because he never served anyone
- he didn't cheat
- he won a massive victory in this court proving he didn't cheat
- someone saw him in a parking lot with his daughter or something and called him a mean name
- he cannot work because he is a poker cheater
- threw all **** at wall except facts and law
- trying to get help at legal aid clinic or something but then that person had heart attack and couldn't help him
- Other attorney talks 30 seconds total, Mike Postle Bullshits for 20+ minutes
- Mike Postle is real victim here, social media campaign, harassment, won lawsuit that vindicated him, and this motion against me not fair
- Judge: Do you have any law that changes the statute from saying "I MUST AWARD REASONABLE ATTORNEY FEES" MP: "NO"
Tentative ruling affirmed.
My commentary: It would be legal malpractice to dismiss the complaint after the anti-slapp filed. Basically just automatic defeat.