Quote:
Originally Posted by Gzesh
Seriously, who the f**k cares about what strategy a cheater felt might maximize his overall take from his cheating ?
However, have at it, even if its solely for your own amusement.
Lol mate, some people on the internet have a discussion that you find unappealing and you get the urge to let them know? That somehow reminds me of the guy at 2:55min -->
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YulXp2Vy7lM&t=2m55s
To the gentlemen before you:
You presume him to choose the stupidest and least elaborate way of conducting the cheat, but on the other hand be reflective enough to assume he'll get caught etc? Hard to imagine tbh. Not to mention the assumptions regarding the ending of the stream, for which not the slightest indication exists.
Taking into consideration to get caught would also imply that he took the respective degree of penalty into consideration. I don't know the US law, but that should be the point where someone who is that reflective quits the idea of risking everything for a 2/5 game.
One thing regarding his crotch staring. Judges, as they have to deal with niches on the regular, typically get themselves specialists that counsel them on the specifics of the case at hand. I really believe that these ppl will come to the conclusion that the way he allegedly conducted the cheat is so stupid and outdated, that it will eventually be taken as an argument for his innocence.
Even if he had no chance to use RFI cards, marked cards, lenses, or whatever, it simply would've taken a single spy ear-piece to listen to his commentating buddys. That's it. $30 invested for an earpiece which is so small that you need a pincette to get it out again and therefore a near-zero chance for someone to see it.