Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Card
25:25 Kasey: "Justin just said he didn't have 88, he had 78"
It's not necessarily Justin's idea.
Either someone on the team told Justin this fake info, to relay it to Kasey, or the idea came out of Justin's head.
That hand is kinda old news, but it's definitely crucial to the investigation.
JFK is intermittently patrolling the room. You can see him behind Mike just after the 88 v TT hand at
21:32. At other times, he was behind that wall he's just emerged from, possibly watching a live feed, possibly with holecards up.
JFK was also active in the stream chat when it was broadcast half an hour later. You can see him chatting on there (he has a moderator's spanner icon), and that's where Casey saw JFK's claim that Mike had 87.
At some point, JFK
may have spoken to Postle. If you keep watching the video (for 25 minutes after the hand),
maybe you'll see him speak to him directly. Or maybe he texted. Or maybe he invented the whole idea. I believe he actually says in the chatbox "I went and asked him".
To summarize a few possible realities:
1. JFK was watching live but without knowing holecards, or just noticed a big hand that intrigued him while he was roaming the floor. JFK spoke to Postle to ask him what he had in that hand where the board came 994T8 and Postle flat-out lied, and JFK believed him, and JFK then unwittingly passed on this lie to the YouTube chat later on.
2. JFK was 'secretly' watching with holecards up and couldn't believe Postle's play, so went and asked him about it, and believed the lie about the RFID failure, so passed it on in the chatbox later.
3. JFK was aware of the cheating, so pretended to have spoken to Postle, and invented the story about a holecard mix up, when the hand came up on the YouTube stream.
4. The RFID was wrong, and Postle told the truth for once in his life, and Justin relayed correct information. (lol)
There may be another scenario I haven't thought of. With all these suspicious activities regarding staff in the room, you have to consider that there might
in some cases be a "normal" explanation. None of the above scenarios look good for Justin Keraitus though. He's either naive, gullible, and negligent about livestream security, or a cheat.