I posted about this here. Here's what that post produced:

I think Mike Matusow did a great job.

He had only reviewed 3 hands so he didn't have a real grasp of what went down. Does it make him a less qualified interviewer than Joey? Definitely.
But, had he reviewed more hands, there's a good chance this interview never happens.

If you listened to part 2 Mike actually asks multiple tough questions in a very non-alarming way to Postle. Instead of answering them Postle redirects the conversation to something else entirely probably because he can't answer them.

He takes the phone out of his pocket and into the croutch position and gid mode is activate the very next hand he plays LOL

I have never seen someone look at their phone like that while in a hand. Maybe once if they get an important text or phone call in the middle of a hand but not consistently like that. If I played against him, I would be immediately suspicious of him bc of this. I would literally ask him why he is on his phone so much.

Plus even if he wasn't looking at his phone, I would still say he is cheating in some way. Any poker player with even a handful of experience and knowledge could tell he is playing with perfect information, it is the only way to explain his terrible plays that always work out in his favor. We, as humans, all have tendencies and leaks in our game. His playing style, with crazy bluffs, he should punt his stack off once in a while, but he never does.

Do your own research, people have spent countless hours trying to prove he is guilty and put it up for display for all to view. I hate it when people with 5 posts or less come in demanding things done for them.

Ive slowed it down , is there an outline of some circular disc in his pocket?

https://youtu.be/ae85REys1T0

yea ive heard the stream basically runs at a snail's pace by comparison to the normal 30/hr expectation, and i doubt the std dev in a full ring live game is actually 100 either.

the chance he isn't cheating can literally be rounded to 0% under even the most favorable of assumptions.

Post a hand from the date he started cheating where he bluffed into a strong hand for a sizeable amount. Not one of the 50 or so of his plays where he bluffed perfectly. Just one single hand will do.

I'll give you a heads up, there isn't one single hand when he started messing with his phone where Postle bluffed into a strong hand.

The guy is a disgusting scumbag STEALING money and it sickens me there's people like you defending him. He literally laughs at people while he steals.

Look at this shít.

https://twitter.com/Joeingram1/statu...51345923018752

Virtually every pro and semi pro records their results. I even know of *better* games than this Postle game (and their are dozens of these across NA) where a billionaire basically just punts stacks once or twice a week.
I've never seen anyone post or claim a winrate near what Postle has over even half the sample. Ever. It is impossible.

Complete fiasco mate. I like Matusow and think he is a character, but he is the wrong dude for this kind of interview. No real dive into the main topics and just a ramble about Ultimate Bet.

and everybody who wants to cast doubt or pollute the discourse at this point, including and especially mike ****ing matusow, can kindly shut the **** up now

He was known for his weird plays a couple streams after he first started cheating? I was un aware of this.

Yeah, checking on game scores and side convos at the most crucial moments of hands you're involved in, that checks out. Cell phone addiction? Give it up Mike, you're cooked

Everybody knows this guy is Mike. You can quit being an idiot now.
Have fun in jail you useless scumbag everybody in the world knows you cheated and its on ****ing video.

Another simple statistical approach would be to compare his winnings/session from streams when he wasn't using the 'cheating' tells and playing style (pre- July 18, 2018 and the period in summer 2019 when certain staffers were at the WSOP) with his winnings/session when he's been deduced to be cheating. Looking at the graphics, it's a virtual certainty that the two groups are significantly different with an extremely high probability.

If someone can remind me of exactly which sessions during the summer 2019 weren't 'cheating' ones, I'll plug the numbers into the tried and true nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test for determining statistical significance of group differences. If it's found that he wins significantly more from the 'superusing' sessions with a probability of, say, 99%, it's not proof of cheating but another strong piece of evidence consistent with the many others that these sessions are extreme outliers.

Everybody is entitled to their own opinion as to the degree of "proof" the evidence uncovered to date represents.

However, your posts in this thread seem to go beyond a healthy skepticism of the cheating allegations and border on being disingenuous and, dare I say, trollish.

If you have anything of substance to contribute to this thread, please start doing so.

Don't waste your time replying to this waste of a human being. He either is Mike himself or his IQ level is less than 1 either way it doesnt matter.

This is interesting and worth looking further into. Kaysee is clearly very uncomfortable about the question.

Her statement helps paint a picture on why though:


That was after it was made clear to the public he was cheating though so you never know. Should be easy to corroborate.

So Kaysee went to management (have to assume this includes Justin) on March 13th with concerns that Postle was cheating

Justin posted a video on his facebook page on March 14th showing Postle losing a big pot. This was the only hand he had ever linked to on his public profile page

Justin knew what was going on and was trying to cover it up, period

lol the ******ed commentators again. "Is mike gonna put him on another overpair here again?" As if overpairs are the only hands that would bet that board.

Great post.

And yea, even if he played good ranges preflop this winrate wouldn't be plausible.

Thing is he plays complete TRASH junky hands and somehow is the best live player in the world.

Lol @ people saying there is no evidence at this point.
They're either Mike or doesn't know **** about poker or math

Justin is the man who started this whole thing most likely hes the most suspicious person on the show other than mike.

its JFK, Postle, and Taylor. split 3 ways

New Pokerfuse podcast came out today, starts Postle talk around 12:30 mark. Seems pretty good so far.

https://pokerfuse.com/poker-podcasts...podcast/15475/

Which part of this is impossible? What do you think Postle's winrate is?

I was convinced Justin was in on it right after reading this thread the first days, before Joey started the investigation streams. Now there is no doubt in my mind he's involved.

Maybe but Mike only needs JFK and im sure he'd rather split 2 ways.