Quote:
Originally Posted by Dream Crusher
Filing the lawsuit was a mistake, regardless of whether it had merit or not.
how do you figure that? If he didn't do it, he had an easy half million in judgements coming, if they based damages off his income as it appeared on the stream.
So again, why won't the casino release the wifi and let us know if the accusations he was getting signals from the staff have merit.
I wonder why. LOL Because it doesn't show anything that people here said it would.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atarirob
Currently he is preventing his ex from seeing her child.
Pretty much hoping the courts make these decisions not the ex-spouse.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dustin.d.marks
ROTFLMAO
You have ZERO understanding of the US (or Cali) Constitution. Granted; it's 2+2 NVG so it's a low bar for posting.
The US Constitution and it''s attendant document "the Bill of Rights" are there to RESTRICT GOVERNMENT(s).
Restrict what government? There is no government without a constitution.
The purpose of the constitution is to create a government of agreed upon powers. Nothing about the nature of a constitution says those powers must be limited, unless the constitution says so. Our constitution creates a government of enumerated, limited powers.
The Bill of Rights is there to limit the federal government's authority and did not limit state government authority until very recently. This incorporation of the Bill of Rights to protect against state and local action is what the GOP meant by standing up for the Supreme Court's violation of States' Rights.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlatTireSuited
Sure you can sue for legal malpractice, but if you lied to your attorney (presuming we're talking about lies relevant to the case and not a lie like "I used to be a professional bodybuilder and can hit a golf ball 400 yards", good luck winning that case.
Postle: My lawyer screwed me because he did X.
Lawyer: I did X because he told me facts A, B and C, and I felt X was the best legal strategy given facts A, B and C. It turns out A, B, and C are entirely false and complete lies, and the truth is F, G and H. X is a horribly dumb legal strategy for him in a world where A, B and C are false and F, G and H are the truth. I would never have taken that route, and would have done Y and Z, instead of X.
Postle: But X cost me money!
Lawyer: I only did X because you told me A, B and C. Had you told me F, G and H, I would not have done X, I would have done Y, and you wouldn't have to pay Wittles and Veronica money.
Postle: Damnit I really should have called that hand where I turned top hair after calling with just backdoor draws. Veronica caught on to my martingale strategy and I blew the easiest way to make $200K a year playing poker by not having even the SLIGHTEST bit of subtlety or discretion to my cheating!!!!
Before you simply said if the client lied, the lawyer is immune to malpractice.
Me: I am not addicted to heroin.
Lawyer: I will not challenge the illegal search.
I lied to the lawyer, but that does not excuse his malpractice by not challenging the illegal search.
Last edited by madlex; 06-08-2021 at 09:56 AM.