Quote:
Originally Posted by Outoftime44444
This will not be a hard case to prove in civil court for the defendants.
Well, unless Postle can prove he was called a criminal, and he hasn't been convicted of or even arrested for a crime.
For many people, the idea of someone calling a private person (if postle is a private person) a criminal when they haven't been arrested is wrong, unless you're dealing with some kind of crime of violence.
I'm not even clear on why he'd lie about looking at the phone (personals? sports betting? what was it)? As though that can't be checked. If he can show he was looking at the phone for a different reason than cheating at those times, suddenly many of the accusations that he cheated are dubiousness.
You believe he'd claim to be using the phone for a reason that he couldn't back up? I mean the lawyers HAD to tell him that the records would be retrieved and if they contradicted his account, Postle could face serious trouble for perjury when as things stand, he is walking away scot free from this fiasco.
Right now the cops don't care. Submitting fraudulent legal documents is a way to change that.
So he lies?