I appreciate the warm words. The video took painstakingly long to produce and 95% of it was finding the hands and editing them together to be able to get a consumable length to cover 20 hands. The actual voicing part was easy. Because of the process I now have easy access to all of the hands and can link you to the hand in question here:

https://youtu.be/

It starts at 3:06:30 of the $5/$5/$10 Postle and Pals! with Sean Thomas and Chris Glasgow 5/4/19 episode.

Jeff Boski gets dealt T4os from S1, and then S3 (who is away from the table) is dealt J4os. Those hands are folded in the first 10 seconds before there is even any significant action. Postle cant be looking at his phone all the time, there is no reason to until at least there is a decision to be made. Why would he stare at a bunch of garbage preflop hands. I would say there is a 99% chance that he would not have seen these hands folded.

Also when the actual decision needs to be made the graphics show him at 42% vs the other hands and I am assuming that it is not taking into account the folded cards.

Lastly the purpose of the video was to show how egregious his decision making process would be if straight. When we are at the table we dont know that two other 4s have been folded when we are considering calling two all ins with 54os. The equities I displayed don't account for dead cards because in reality we don't know what the dead cards are.

I thought the whole point of your post was not to alert suspicion that people were trying to investigate them.

It is, they don't tell people they are investigating them, unlike Veronica who told the world, including Postle, and Kuraitis, that there were suspicions.

yeah. unfortunately I agree with you as well

I tweeted this in that thread just now but with all the dead cards considered not just the two 4’s, the 45 has 42.7% equity per poker cruncher.

Why does no one suspect anyone other than JFK of being in with Postle? Why not suspect one of the techs or someone else with access to the live feeds? When you combine the crotch staring, stuffed helmet, and excessive length of time before acting, it’s obvious he’s being fed info.

Off topic, Bart Hanson the man. CLP is great training site and he has done a ton of research on this situation in order to give an educated opinion.

Yeah it's definitely possible and probable. I think people are focused on JFK because he's the loudest defender. Also given the position he's in, his statements and behavior are completely bizarre for an innocent, rational person to have.

they did. you are seeing the action tracking version of the game, the camera on mike's seat (and everyone's seat) is constantly recording. the tech in the back can see all of the cameras at all times.
also this is a CASINO!! there are cameras EVERYWHERE. they were on Justin and mike. the problem is it was happening on the inside and the casino security just watch players.

Unhappy, yet stunningly beautiful, polak, to the best of your knowledge has a criminal investigation been initiated? How do most people feel Postle accomplished his cheat, what methods?
Is Postle still allowed to play there? Does he? Do you?
There have to be others in the know; why, in your opinion, has no one ran their mouth and spilled the beans?
Thanks and good for you for having the courage to report him.

Occam's Razor tells me Stones wants this story to disappear. No way they'd pay to keep it alive. Are you really saying Stones cares more about changing the narrative than having people forget the story altogether?

If you had watched the streams you would know that what you say is inaccurate, as the inside job meant he chose to sit at the same regular seat that had an angle of viewing that would not show his under the table activities. It was similarly easy for Kuraitis to get the secuity cameras not to look at that area closely. This is why he would need to be recorded by a non Stones camera he and the staff did not know was in place. The investigation was Veronica complaining to Kuraitis, and him saying it had been investigated, and her then going public with her doubts, with no attempt having made to think of how to catch him red handed.

Seems like very little, for a casino, getting off with what looks like attorney fees and rake LOL to put this behind them.

Yeah, they should, but dumb is winning that battle.

I was referring to why he is posting such utter stupidity and the concept of going on film. That is absolutely conjured up in some PR's office.

Really? What about fraud in drug dealing? Oh you meant legal activities. Ideally sure, but fraud should be punished whereever it occurs. But gambling is only legal because states have revenue needs, and Vegas. And now, Atlantic City and PA casinos pressure NY to legalize. And etc.

Gambling is bad for society. We know this. It's legal because well, America is freedom LOL.

It's legal because. But to go a step further and say the courts should resolve gambling disputes seems like a waste. We resolve real estate disputes because we want to protect people who participate in the real estate market as it's fundamental to our economy.

Gambling is not. also: gambling disputes are more difficult to resolve for many reasons inherent to gambling that gamblers would not be willing to change, primarily the cash, no record keeping nature of the activity.

Angry Polak has definitely watched the streams. And hopefully Angry Pollak will tell Veronica your thoughts and then can write Veronica's response on here.

Correct me if I'm wrong here, but Mac the lawyer has arranged a settlement where the defendants have all probably lost money (especially including his fees) and also given Postle and Justin a signed statement for them to wave in all our faces saying they have done nothing wrong. The lawsuit so far has been nothing short of disastrous in my eyes.

The settlement statement doesn't mention Postle at all, afaik

By Jason I guess you mean Justin, btw

I had been thinking something along those lines as well, at least for Justin. Don't think it gives Postle much.

Ty. FMP.

As Angry Polak is Veronica, it is possible she may indeed share her thoughts on the timing of the case. In retrospect I am sure those that brought the case wish they had taken more time to gather evidence before going public with their doubts, softly softly catchee monkey, not going on Twitter with your doubts before you have any evidence. It is surprising how badly it has turned out for them, Lawyer Mac said ahead of events that he wanted to use this case to gain recognition for his legal abilities, instead the case got thrown out for inadmissibility, which does not reflect well on his legal abilities at all. And those suing have not done well either. Postle however is laughing all the way to the bank, having won hundreds of thousands of dollars playing near perfect poker stream after stream.

According to VerStandig - " And the court actually ruled in our favor – somewhat. For the first time in California history, we were allowed to proceed with a suit for gaming-centric losses; the one catch, though, is the recovery for most claims would be capped at the rake collected."

They could have continued the lawsuit, proceeding with discovery, deposed Postle and JFK, instead they settled what the rake would have been (40k? i hear?) and a daft statement.

After costs and fees the clients get $300-$400 a person? Was it worth it?

Stones basically gave back the rake for its crooked games to lawyers and 40 players and got away with it all.

Even IF Stones' employees were not involved, they still were massively negligent and seem to be negligent to this day with Justin still around running their social media and hyping up the settlement statement lol.

The time to investigate was during not while the games were going on but during the lawsuit. With the lawsuit they had free reign to subpoena and depose people. But Stones used the leverage of the capped damages and just paid peanuts- far less than it would have cost to defend the case in legal fees- likely Stones paid less than what it would have cost to defend even a few of its employees depositions.

Stones massive winner in all this.

0 depositions on the record. 0 discovery. 0 facts. They forced the settlement on the pleadings, meaning they got their way with just the allegations of the complaint and the law, before any facts came out in a public lawsuit.

Think about depositions- party's can attend depositions. The plaintiffs in this case could have sat in the room while Postle or JFK were grilled on their BS. But nope, Stones escaped.

California law doomed the case of course, but Stones settled for less than probably they pay a single employee in a wrongful termination settlement for an employee that deserved to be fired! In other words, I bet if they fired JFK and he sued them, he would get more than the total settlement for 60+ plaintiffs here.

https://youtu.be/cQkI_4pjmaw?t=1301
For the religious folks out there, clear as day evidence of some kind of angel/entity presence in the room, This is probably the strongest evidence exonerating him from cheating as if he's in contact with an angel the "God" narrative checks out, Postle=A postle=Jesus 12 apostles. Actually now that I think about it even if you are using some kind of supernatural power to see the cards it's still cheating and unethical, perhaps it's a demon of sorts. Things that make you go hmmm

It seems like a bad deal to make that statement and only get $40K. They had some leverage in that they could go the discovery and depositions. Not only could they grill the culprits, but they could present whatever evidence they found. I realize that it would have been somewhat expensive for both sides.

I wish you would've checked the set of kings on the turn.

that is false! we could not do any discovery until the judge ruled not to dismiss. Our hands were tied. if the judge had allowed the case to move forward we were planning on getting phone records.

some people entertaining some sort of sting operation lead by those of us who thought he was cheating is lol.