Quote:
Originally Posted by PayDatBotItsMeoney
Do you have logs from the server? Camera stills of MP looking at live hole cards? Or sworn affidavit from JK admitting that he cheated? Didn't think so.
I don't know why you bothered quoting a post that you apparently didn't even bother to read - I guess it was just to make the same point over again?
He acknowledged in that post that there is no "hard proof" like you describe, so your "gotcha" is rather silly. The exchange reads kind of like this:
Mr Spyutastic: It's true that we don't have logs from the server, camera stills of MP looking at live hole cards, or sworn affidavit from JK admitting that he cheated.
PayDatBotItsMeoney: Do you have logs from the server? Camera stills of MP looking at live hole cards? Or sworn affidavit from JK admitting that he cheated? Didn't think so.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PayDatBotItsMeoney
You like everyone judge based on what you see on the streams. What if he stared at his crotch during non streamed games just as much?
What does crotch staring have to do with his post?
Quote:
Originally Posted by PayDatBotItsMeoney
You only have narratives that fit an outcome that you and Veronica want. Just because a bunch of gamblers all came together and looked at streams and said he is cheating doesn't make it fact. Just their opinion. Because you choose to follow that narrative again doesn't make it fact. It is just what you choose to believe. So sure that's your opinion, but it isn't fact.
This thread has narratives that fit the evidence of the results. People have seen results that appear somewhere between extremely unlikely to impossible without some kind of assistance. That evidence is not speculative; it's there for anyone to see. How those results occurred, well that certainly is a matter for speculation. But you repeating over and over that there is no hard evidence of how it happened is really unnecessary - everyone knows that. But it doesn't change the results.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PayDatBotItsMeoney
It's like a cheating wife. All the signs may lead you to an opinion that she is in fact having an affair, but unless you have factual proof i.e. phone records, emails/texts, etc you have nothing. What if she was doing something to surprise you? Or something innocent, yet still could appear suspicious.
It's really nothing like that. The results are compelling evidence that something is amiss.
Now, if you want to argue that the results prove nothing - that there is another plausible explanation for said results, then you should do so. But posting over and over again that people's explanations of how those results were achieved is speculation is sort of a waste of time.