Mike Postle cheating allegations (FAQ in first post)
12-11-2019
, 01:11 AM
12-11-2019
, 02:49 AM
12-11-2019
, 10:36 PM
12-20-2019
, 09:31 PM
Quote:
RE: so clearly obvious super using went on for years
Unless you have the thought planted that someone could be cheating, people would just view it as incredibly good play, much like people viewed it
At least dozens of people had viewed a very good amount of all the sessions and it took two years of it before one of them was sure enough something wasn't right to point it out to others
The fact is that people see what they are looking for, from people commenting here that the show was made up, comments that the commentators are sending secret messages, that they are openly engaging in human trafficking...
If you're looking for something, you'll find it whether it not it's there. That's basic human nature. 100% Postle was cheating, but it's not weird at all that it took so long for they're to be enough random observations to plant the thought he could have hole card data.
RE: TT vs (JJ)4 hand - I've been thinking about this a lot. It definitely is problematic. If there was a card reading error, how would Mike know he was beat? Also, did he later show jacks? I could have sworn he mucked and at the time of the broadcast he couldn't have known they had his hole card data wrong
Unless you have the thought planted that someone could be cheating, people would just view it as incredibly good play, much like people viewed it
At least dozens of people had viewed a very good amount of all the sessions and it took two years of it before one of them was sure enough something wasn't right to point it out to others
The fact is that people see what they are looking for, from people commenting here that the show was made up, comments that the commentators are sending secret messages, that they are openly engaging in human trafficking...
If you're looking for something, you'll find it whether it not it's there. That's basic human nature. 100% Postle was cheating, but it's not weird at all that it took so long for they're to be enough random observations to plant the thought he could have hole card data.
RE: TT vs (JJ)4 hand - I've been thinking about this a lot. It definitely is problematic. If there was a card reading error, how would Mike know he was beat? Also, did he later show jacks? I could have sworn he mucked and at the time of the broadcast he couldn't have known they had his hole card data wrong
12-20-2019
, 09:58 PM
0:25
"Taking em off here boss!"
Quote:
Sometimes nothing can be a real cool hand.
12-21-2019
, 09:26 AM
12-21-2019
, 07:43 PM
Every dealer I've talked to about it there has basically asked me not to talk about it and passively acknowledged that he was cheating.
12-22-2019
, 05:27 PM
