Absoulte SNAP. ****in gangster

Great find. Ive seen alot of sessions but this one i havent. And that hand is sick. Look at what mike is holdinng in his left hand after he blows up and moves his chair. He grasping that phone in his crotch big time.

Wow, I can't believe that once again you think that I am trying to say that Postle isn't cheating or that I'm trying to defend him in some way. I am doing the opposite. I am trying to strengthen the case against him by pointing an issue he or his team could use to claim there was a problem with the hole card identifications, so we can show that the malfunctions only occur in specific situations.

Let me help you out by stating this explicitly one more time: THIS IS SO THAT PEOPLE CAN POINT OUT THAT NONE OF THESE ERRORS THAT OCCURRED ON OTHER HANDS ARE AN EXPLANATION FOR WHAT HAPPENED IN THE HANDS WHERE HE SAYS THERE WAS A MALFUNCTION.

Geez, posts like yours actually lend credence to the people that say you can't point out any flaw in the evidence or everyone screams "troll!" But in your case, you can't even tell the difference between someone trying to make the case against Postle stronger and someone defending him.

GOD not raising river with the best hand.

https://youtu.be/H_cVJRsAktw?t=2h54m41s

I'm just amazed that if someone says "hey, let's take a closer look at this element to make sure we examine it carefully to help make the case stronger", the response is, "NO, YOU IDIOT! IT'S ALREADY PROVEN HE'S GUILTY!"

No room for nuanced discussion on this subject. People can't even tell the difference between being circumspect and taking the other side.

https://youtu.be/H_cVJRsAktw?t=2238

Talk about card reader errors - what on earth is going on in this hand at 37:18?? Poor old Veronica.

@Eponymous
@Olswang

Play my guess the tabled cards game, I wanna see what you think?

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/s...postcount=8849

More importantly right after the hand they say, "Randy's already texting him, Randy ask him..." sorry for the ignorance but I don't know who Randy is but that seems odd they're communicating in booth with someone they can talk to that is texting a player in the game.

Talk about a lack of rules and checks and balances.

Blimey - I can hardly see - can't really make out suits - either 9,9 or 10,10 ??

I'd be more interested to see if the 9-10 of (diamonds? maybe one spade?) was held by Mike at any point previously, or if there's any 'suspicious card read errors' where Mike is shown to have an Ace previously to that.

IE: The guy in charge of the cards rebound the RFID's to a different card? Or is that not possible?

Definitely either 9-10 suited or one of them is diamond/spade?

You can count the pips if you zoom in, and it's definitely 10 9. It's hard to tell the suits. They both look black to me. I'm assuming not both spades since it would have made him a flush.

Watch out. Grind On My Mind will jump down your throat and say it was obviously a graphics change. Haven't you seen the podcasts?!!?!!?

Never mind the fact that a graphics change here wouldn't help Postle in any way especially since his cards were tabled and no one at the table is questioning that he won.

This is an amazing game - billed as a 1-3 - there is almost $50k on the table by the end is playing more like a 25-50!!!!

Both wrong.
Nope.
Close... but no, no diamonds.
Closer...

The answer is 9 of spades & 10 of spades! Thank you all for playing Better luck next time.

Well that was interesting. So half of you see diamonds, when it's spades? Interesting.
You all seemed so certain about those 9's yesterday lol
That was fun

There was no winner this time in the quiz, so I shall give you all a participation/booby prize, the clip showing that hand:
https://youtu.be/PX5ccjVEapY?t=11280

First of all im not going to get in a back and forth with you so just stop. I responded to one of your posts and mentioned the 96 changing to 98 hand and where people can find more info with regards to that specific scenario where the graphics change. I apologize by my wording to you in that quoted post because i did misread what u said, so sorry about that. Regardless im not jumping down anyones throat. My focus here is to provide great information to this thread and i have done that greatly. My apologies.

Mark had that exact AA the hand before that.

For those who have observed the arrogance and foolishness of Postle's not realizing when he should NOT use godmode, it's interesting to recall that Potripper first attracted suspicion when he called a 9-high bluff with T-high to win a tournament.
https://sites.google.com/site/demonp...tepokerscandle

Yet people still want to discuss bb/100.

Game is awesome. (Sans cheating obv.) Even if you never got into a pot with Mike, this game is gold.

Yes and he flatted them! I guess he really wants to go 9-ways to the flop with aces or something.

Bad play even for a superuser. However, I am sure he could get away from aces if he was beat.

https://youtu.be/CaIDitdLRuw?t=9896
02/05/2019

I guess it could be worth to have a closer look at this stream now.
Man, Moneymaker seems to be hungry. ��

https://youtu.be/CaIDitdLRuw?t=13563

Alright, what is that again?

I went back to the hand before, Mike had 62o and Naga 83o.

https://youtu.be/CaIDitdLRuw?t=15651

And then again this fold here, hm, this session was somehow strange, maybe he adopted his play cause Moneymaker was there.

Fair enough. All good. Sorry I stomped my feet a bit, but I felt like it was the only way to get the point across that my posts were getting misinterpreted.

That’s good that it fits the pattern that it was a carryover from the last hand so it can be checked that that wasn’t the case whenever Postle claims a card registration error.

LOL. This is rich, given the source.

No. Obviously he deserves a huge amount of credit, but suggesting he did this single-handedly gives short shrift to a lot of other people who have made significant contributions.