Both plays are -EV if you know your opponent have KK. And quite a big -EV especially flop call.

He said he out it on to troll Stones.

Yea, he later said the Stones patch was a troll and also said he won't get a dime from the lawsuit as he is donating any money to Veronica and possibly something else.

Calling pre is not -EV when you can see the cards. And folding on the flop after hitting a pair is too obvious that he is cheating. Show us a hand where he calls on the river for his stack when he is beat. You can't. There is only one hand where that happens when he isn't godmoding. Stop being so dense.

His whole game is making what would normally be -EV calls, but they're not for him since he knows his opponent's cards so his implied odds are huge, and he is never guessing. He knows he can stack his opponent if his cards hit.

First you paint man into corner saying that he did just that (not youpersonally, but collective). Then there is counter evidence against claim that he played every hand perfectly by knowing his opponents hole cards, and then argument changes that yes he knew but every time he played unoptimally he did it to not get caught.

Problem with that argument is, that with that argument it's quite hard to differ play good + run superhot from knowing your opponent cards and use that information at times.

Postle have in that hand 5k$ behind. So flop is like 250$ mistake at least assuming opponent hole cards are known.

Also he could always just map his internal IP to www.dingleberry.com in his hosts file and then use that on the air.

Not if he thinks a runner-runner flush can get the kings' stack.

yeah no he's calling pre flop because he figures his implied odds are good enough to stack kings (or bluff him off on A high boards), then he calls flop because of backdoor draws, it's the same with the JTo hand where he float flop 932 against 99, but then folded on a J turn against half pot bet in a single raised pot and the pot was tiny

Looks like we have another troll that you should be keeping an eye on.

You could use an app like Angry IP Scanner and scan the entire subnet for live IP addresses with open ports.

If the DHCP server provides you with an address on the same subnet that the hole card stream is being broadcast on, you could theoretically know the IP address without someone explicitly telling you.

If you were really crafty, you'd use a vulnerability scanner against the open ports in efforts to breach any security mechanisms in place.

That's the script kiddie way of doing it.

If Postile did this, it's possible that he violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

Did he? Who knows? I just know that you can't go around randomly pentesting and attempting to/successfully breaching someones network. Even if their password is password.

Will be interested to see Berkeys pod with Doug and go more in depth about how it could have been done.

This scam only works in that casino at those stakes. Better players would see through the BS and he obviously can't play elsewhere.

Could an individual victim simply go through the hands he was involved in, calculate a reasonable estimate of the loss due to cheating, and file a suit in small claims court?

Why are people even entertaining/ arguing with someone whose proof that Postle laid down the best hand was showing a hand where Postle laid down the worst hand.

Look, this is getting silly.

You seem to be new to the thread (not that there is anything wrong with that) and seem to be uninformed about the details and descriptions of the allegations.

Please go back and read the first post in the thread which gives a "high level" summary of the situation. If you have the time and inclination, I'd also suggest skimming the thread and/or watching the videos by Joey and others.

As another poster just posted, it has become very difficult to differentiate your posts from those that would come from a troll.

In flop: pot size 1.3k$

Flop bet 450$

Postle stack size 5k$.

Probability for Postle to win: <4%. Need to have much more for call.

Great point. Does Postle ever fold the winning hand?? No.

What stakes did you play??? Now?

He can't just fold flop after hitting a pair on a dry board it would be too obvious he is cheating. He's trying to hide it somewhat.

Show us Postle folding the best hand.

Ahh, so I wasn't the only one ITT trying to get Berkey's IP address.

Yes. Up to $10,000. And the rules of evidence are less stringent there.

There's probably some value from a PR standpoint for the clients to be standing together on this. And there's immense value for the law firms involved. But if your sole purpose was to get some money back from Postle and Stones as quickly as possible, small claims would be a great idea.

anyway you can argue that Mike is bad I don't care, but please show me a spot where he folds the best hand

Postle was a terrible cheat but sounds like you would of lasted one session before being caught. He can't just play every single street perfectly without being busted, the commentators and viewers are going to click on pretty quick no? Losing some EV on flops and turns to turn into the messiah on the river is a massive win for him and isn't as obvious he is cheating.

From same stream:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6w4TguWyUH0
1:15:20

Anthony and Postle have both 43o. Anthony bets flop and Postle folds.

This just proves you don't know what you're talking about. He calls pre to try crack KK, and calls flop because of the back door flushdraw knowing if he hits his hand he can win a huge pot. It's a concept known as implied odds. He took the same line with the JT hand vs 999, even though he turned top pair in that example.

If he's never calling preflop when he's behind he's only calling AA in that spot, DUCY?

Please go watch Joey Ingram's second stream on Postle #2, and then come back to the thread. There's literally dozens of hands there that show he's cheating, all from a single session.