Mike Postle cheating allegations (FAQ in first post)
10-09-2019
, 11:26 AM
10-09-2019
, 11:31 AM
Quote:
Hey something else very interesting here. Keep watching - he goes to take a bite of food, keeping phone hidden close to chest, but glasses showing full blue, Harlan to his right starts looking at him, and then you can then see him showing Harlen his phone, but before he shows Harlan its now and a white background - looks like text messaging - ie he switched from the blue screened app - at 27:49.
10-09-2019
, 11:35 AM
Thanks for that. Also for those that think the glasses are blue causing this, look at the gif he just put up, you can clearly see the blue light from his phone on his shirt.
10-09-2019
, 11:46 AM
haha, funny waking up to that story after all this. Funnily enough, it was a poker player who gave her the idea!
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/showbiz/...ooney-20545183
There is a simple explanation for this KcQc hand. Gina holds KcQc in the previous hand. Hands lagging from previous hands a repeated problem in the streams (sometimes attributed to same player, sometimes a different one), and somewhat muddy the waters.
Having looked at A LOT of these now in trying to eliminate the significance of the 89s hand, can say it - and it alone - remains inexplicable.
Whilst I don't think it can be conclusive evidence, it's been a key red flag that Mike clearly had an accomplice on the inside of the live feed tech. Am certain the person named as the accomplice in the lawsuit will also be the person who made this panic change in real time to try and minimise MP's ridiculous play in this spot.
great catch. unsure whether quality will be good enough, but would be particularly amusing if Mike is nailed by shades that he often has there, but never ever wears.
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/showbiz/...ooney-20545183
Quote:
Exactly, I don't know why people are just skipping over this, the strongest evidence against mike was the 89s hand and the math side of things, VPIP of 63% at 1/3 2/5 900bb/100.
The whole arguement was that the individual in the back changed the cards to 89s because the play would've looked way too suspicious, but in this situation there is no reason to alter other peoples cards at the table, why would you intentionally give veronica and the other individual both Kc? Matt said two cards can not register twice, but in this case it seems that it did and why on earth would the individual in the back even do that?
The whole arguement was that the individual in the back changed the cards to 89s because the play would've looked way too suspicious, but in this situation there is no reason to alter other peoples cards at the table, why would you intentionally give veronica and the other individual both Kc? Matt said two cards can not register twice, but in this case it seems that it did and why on earth would the individual in the back even do that?
Having looked at A LOT of these now in trying to eliminate the significance of the 89s hand, can say it - and it alone - remains inexplicable.
Whilst I don't think it can be conclusive evidence, it's been a key red flag that Mike clearly had an accomplice on the inside of the live feed tech. Am certain the person named as the accomplice in the lawsuit will also be the person who made this panic change in real time to try and minimise MP's ridiculous play in this spot.
great catch. unsure whether quality will be good enough, but would be particularly amusing if Mike is nailed by shades that he often has there, but never ever wears.
10-09-2019
, 11:49 AM
Quote:
Yeah.
I decided to compare the colors of the graphics software to the shot of Mike's phone.
Here's his phone
Here's the software.
Notice the hue. Saturation and brightness are off, as expected given screen differences, angle of the phone, and lighting. But the hue (H: = the actual color) is almost identical.
Then again I thought maybe all bright blue is that close, so I googled bright blue and picked some shades that looked similar. I got 230 and 247. Interesting that they're that close. Maybe some graphic experts can weigh in on the likelihood of that.
Also notice all the empty space. It looks exactly like what the software looks like in the demo wiiziwiig posted - mostly empty space (where the live camera shots would be) with cards along the edges.
Now that we know that they likely just piped the data out to another party and what the unused streaming feature looks like when you're not actually using GFK to put the actual stream together - that blue screen makes a ton of sense.
I decided to compare the colors of the graphics software to the shot of Mike's phone.
Here's his phone
Here's the software.
Notice the hue. Saturation and brightness are off, as expected given screen differences, angle of the phone, and lighting. But the hue (H: = the actual color) is almost identical.
Then again I thought maybe all bright blue is that close, so I googled bright blue and picked some shades that looked similar. I got 230 and 247. Interesting that they're that close. Maybe some graphic experts can weigh in on the likelihood of that.
Also notice all the empty space. It looks exactly like what the software looks like in the demo wiiziwiig posted - mostly empty space (where the live camera shots would be) with cards along the edges.
Now that we know that they likely just piped the data out to another party and what the unused streaming feature looks like when you're not actually using GFK to put the actual stream together - that blue screen makes a ton of sense.
