Quote:
Originally Posted by kimikaze88
Yeah, I understand what you mean. It all depends on jury and judge to believe. It is a weak evidence tho but we also have to remember if only 1 catch blue or whatever the screen color, they can get away with that. But if multiple time especially whenever making an important decision, it is not coincidence.
Yes, and evidence can be subject to something I would call "combined theory", for example, evidence that is isolated can either be "weak", or it can be "strong", the strength of evidence can change over time, for example.
Exhibit A) Let's say theoretically we can prove without a reasonable doubt that the RFID was manipulated, well if we can then the other evidence of crotch staring, blue screens is now actually strenghtened.
Exhibit B) We cannot prove with a reasonable doubt that the RFID was manipulated, that other evidence of crotch staring, blue screens, becomes extremely weak now, that evidence needs to be combined with RFID manipulation to actually be strong.