Quote:
Originally Posted by 27AllIn
After listening to Mike Matosow's part interview, it seems like Mike Postle has some legitimate points. The numbers weren't accurate, so he didn't win $250k. If he won significantly less than that, and if only certain hands were cherry picked to make him look bad, then he very well could be innocent. This whole thing is turning into a bit of a witch hunt...
He also said he's not greedy and giving money back at various points. That's something that can be fact checked.
Postle should certainly have a fair platform to defend himself, same as Justin.
Gosh, you and most other viewers have totally missed how wrong Postle's defence is. He is saying the figures don't account for rebuys and add ons. And he is 100% right, they don't.
But what he covers up is they very accurately report how much he won or lost in the hands screened, which is irrespective of how much he started off with on the table.
So if I start off having $5000 on the table and win $12000 in the session, it is the SAME as having $5000 plus $5000 rebuys and winning $12000 in the session.
And any rebuys or add ons bought before screening would be minimal as he is such a winning player he hardly ever rebuys or adds on.
So the figure of $250K won still stands as an accurate figure of winnings, and any untelevised results are separate to that, so the focus needs to be on the proven televised play.