Quote:
Originally Posted by DHPoker
If he has multiple accomplices wanting their cut he pretty much has to win every hand just to make it worth everyone’s time and effort.
Assuming he's made around 250k USD over the past 18 months, splitting that 3 ways is still over 80k USD of tax free money (at least to his co-conspirators, I assume they are not declaring this income to the IRS).
Clearly the more people in on the scam, the greater the risk of getting caught. Three seems to be the perfect number: small enough to minimize risk, but large enough to pull this off.
I think you need someone who is technical and someone who has authority to approve changes with how they stream. So allowing, for example, remote access to a server, would require someone to approve, and someone to actually open the port on the server, and ensure the receiver can decrypt the stream.
A rogue technician could perhaps do this by himself, but he would need to be on-site more or less nonstop. Any other technical person who found out would immediately understand something is very wrong. Having someone in charge is the perfect cover, as any suspicion raised could be managed, e.g. "I approved opening that port, I wanted to test some functionality for a new stream, it's OK."
At the same time, an authority figure alone, with no technical support, would be stuck if there are issues during the stream. Even if you think Mike could be the technical guy, who sets things up before playing, there are still hundreds of things that could go wrong during the broadcast. You wouldn't want to risk that, you want a senior technical guy in on the plan, monitoring things in real time. And as I said, a technician not in on the scam would find a back door quickly, and start asking questions. That is just too risky.
Also, two people would make things much easier if info had to be pushed to Mike's phone in real time. One person can't just do this nonstop for 5 hours of play. Two people could work together to cover things, and also provide an alibi if needed. "I was in the booth commentating, how could I send anything to Mike?!?"
I think the key here is really the RFID mishaps. Understand who jumped up to quickly provide a justification for Mike's crazy play, who confirmed it definitely happened that way, who changed the graphics or ordered someone to change the graphics, and you have your co-conspirators.
Last edited by PraguePoker; 10-04-2019 at 05:21 AM.