I was thinking about the supposed rfid error in the 86o versus 96 hand. There should be a pretty easy way to detect whether the 86o was in fact being misread as 8
9
. According to Berkey and Feldman the only way this could occur is if the cards themselves were assigned incongruous codes. So in principle we can go back over all the footage for that night and check whether the 8
or 9
appeared in any video footage from that night. If those cards appear on the board, we can check if they are misread on the graphics. Since the 8
appears on average in 5 out of 52 flop/turn/rivers, it shouldn't take more than 10 showdown hands to find that card. Same for the 9
. One of those cards should appear on the flop/turn/river within 5 showdown hands. If Stones is using two decks, we would have to skip over every other showdown hand from the 86o hand. That could take twice the time, but still we shouldn't have to check more than 10 showdown hands.