Quote:
Originally Posted by H.O.R.S.E.
Why are poker players so drastic with their accusations?
Hellmuth 100% cheated/angled in that HCL hand! ... even though the only evidence was a confusing, cut off camera angle, and no one at the table (i.e. the people who could actually see what happened) thought he was out of line.
Robbi 100% cheated on that other HCL hand! ... even though there's literally zero evidence for it other than "OMG how can she call!" and "all the top pros agree, if you disagree your an idiot!"
Martin 100% cheated! ... even though the evidence is incredibly weak other than, again "all the top pros agree!" (so if you think he's innocent you're pretty much admiting to being a low stakes fish)
Mike Postle is was 100% cheating! ... even though there's literally zero evidence
etc.
This case is so different from robbi or hellmuth. Postle maybe not.
Martin is so clearly handling the cards in a way that is known to be how a card marker would do it.
On top of that his standing and leaning over to get a good view of something (he says stack, others say cards) is not normal.
These 2 things alone are "evidence"
Remember evidence is different to proof.
However imo it's enough to put forward an accusation.