Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
**** March High Stakes Thread **** **** March High Stakes Thread ****

03-02-2010 , 04:24 PM
lmao cole took the "take meeting" comment pretty well. Didn't want to chase away the fish since Dr Pill is tilty and on a downswing probably.

Thx Tact
03-02-2010 , 04:25 PM
Isildur sitting at one of the cap plo tables.
03-02-2010 , 04:26 PM
Full Tilt Poker $100/$200 No Limit Hold'em - 2 players
The Official 2+2 Hand Converter Powered By DeucesCracked.com

DrPill (BB): $29488.00
Cole South (BTN/SB): $22199.50

Pre Flop: ($300.00)
Cole South raises to $600, DrPill raises to $2100, Cole South raises to $5800, DrPill calls $3700

Flop: ($11600.00) 7 T 9 (2 players)
DrPill checks, Cole South bets $16399.50 all in, DrPill calls $16399.50

Turn: ($44399.00) 6 (2 players - 1 is all in)

River: ($44399.00) 5 (2 players - 1 is all in)

Final Pot: $44399.00
DrPill shows A A (a pair of Aces)
Cole South shows T 7 (two pair, Tens and Sevens)
Cole South wins $44398.50
(Rake: $0.50)

DrPill: u play great wp
03-02-2010 , 04:30 PM
Full Tilt Poker $100/$200 No Limit Hold'em - 2 players
The Official 2+2 Hand Converter Powered By DeucesCracked.com

DrPill (BB): $16374.00
Cole South (BTN/SB): $35310.00

Pre Flop: ($300.00)
Cole South raises to $600, DrPill calls $400

Flop: ($1200.00) 4 7 J (2 players)
DrPill checks, Cole South bets $900, DrPill raises to $2750, Cole South calls $1850

Turn: ($6700.00) 4 (2 players)
DrPill bets $3400, Cole South raises to $16200, DrPill calls $9624 all in

River: ($32748.00) 3 (2 players - 1 is all in)

Final Pot: $32748.00
DrPill shows J Q (two pair, Jacks and Fours)
Cole South shows J K (two pair, Jacks and Fours)
Cole South wins $32747.50
(Rake: $0.50)

Game over.
03-02-2010 , 04:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheTactician
Full Tilt Poker $100/$200 No Limit Hold'em - 2 players
The Official 2+2 Hand Converter Powered By DeucesCracked.com

DrPill (BB): $29488.00
Cole South (BTN/SB): $22199.50

Pre Flop: ($300.00)
Cole South raises to $600, DrPill raises to $2100, Cole South raises to $5800, DrPill calls $3700

Flop: ($11600.00) 7 T 9 (2 players)
DrPill checks, Cole South bets $16399.50 all in, DrPill calls $16399.50

Turn: ($44399.00) 6 (2 players - 1 is all in)

River: ($44399.00) 5 (2 players - 1 is all in)

Final Pot: $44399.00
DrPill shows A A (a pair of Aces)
Cole South shows T 7 (two pair, Tens and Sevens)
Cole South wins $44398.50
(Rake: $0.50)

DrPill: u play great wp



DrPill: did u tape that 107 people would ppay to see that play im shore
03-02-2010 , 04:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by codeman316
DrPill: did u tape that 107 people would ppay to see that play im shore
lol

"cardrunners: bringing more fish to the game" - pretty smart of them really.
03-02-2010 , 04:58 PM
DrPill: did u tape that 107 people would ppay to see that play im shore

donk can't fold aces.
03-02-2010 , 05:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HopelessHousewife
DrPill: did u tape that 107 people would ppay to see that play im shore

donk can't fold aces.
the way that hand was played ?
03-02-2010 , 05:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by no
the way that hand was played ?
the pill comment was in response to cole 3-bet shoving A8o
03-02-2010 , 05:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fl1pm0de98
the pill comment was in response to cole 3-bet shoving A8o
So why did he say 107?
03-02-2010 , 05:16 PM
Easy to 4 bet 10-7 off pre flop when you run like cole
03-02-2010 , 05:19 PM
Dr. Pill , play bad or run bad??
03-02-2010 , 05:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fl1pm0de98
the pill comment was in response to cole 3-bet shoving A8o
qouted fold aa
03-02-2010 , 05:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by errorleet
Dr. Pill , play bad or run bad??
Generally seems to play fairly well from what i've seen.
03-02-2010 , 05:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheTactician

DrPill: u dont get action from durrr and luzak in texas?
DrPill: im shore someone will play but maybe little lower
Look kids, you don't need an education to be good at poker!
03-02-2010 , 05:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by johndoes
How can 20 something scandis be so bad at english?
this.
they learn it from age 7
03-02-2010 , 05:39 PM
lazy internet-age kids
03-02-2010 , 05:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by r1zz0
Look kids, you don't need an education to be good at poker!
why not quote durrr - english is at least his native language
03-02-2010 , 05:48 PM
obv. the scandis playing noosebleed are degen dropouts and prob don't care to much..
03-02-2010 , 05:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by effuluck
Wow Townsend on quite the downswing...since the 1st of the year he's down 1.92 mil....

Kinda puts a smile on my face.http://www.highstakesdb.com/profiles...0Townsend.aspx

down close to 3.5 mil since his turducken party
He should ask Brian Hastings for half of what he won against Isildur
03-02-2010 , 05:54 PM
i wonder what isildurs ego is like ? he gets brought up in every conversation possible whether hes winning or loosing
03-02-2010 , 05:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gabblin
obv. the scandis playing noosebleed are degen dropouts and prob don't care to much..
could just be dyslexia.
03-02-2010 , 06:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Han Solo
Hacking into someone's account and stealing all their money is against the T+C. Swearing in chat is also against the T+C. According to you then, these actions are morally (or rather immorally) equivalent?
technically yes because morals and ethics are socioculturally defined - thus have no factual basis - thus are merely opinions - thus simply because Action A is perceived as more immoral than Action B does not have any impact upon how moral it ACTUALLY IS to commit either action, as the morality of committing either action will always be X, and X will always be an indeterminate entity - Thus the morality of hacking into someone elses account = x, AND the morality of swearing also = x - Thus moral equivalency. Now STFU this is not debate club!
03-02-2010 , 06:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ix.spider.uk
technically yes because morals and ethics are socioculturally defined - thus have no factual basis - thus are merely opinions - thus simply because Action A is perceived as more immoral than Action B does not have any impact upon how moral it ACTUALLY IS to commit either action, as the morality of committing either action will always be X, and X will always be an indeterminate entity - Thus the morality of hacking into someone elses account = x, AND the morality of swearing also = x - Thus moral equivalency. Now STFU this is not debate club!
Jesus... Now I'm wondering if you really thought that looked intellorgent. **** thats bad.
03-02-2010 , 06:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheTactician
DrPill: do u think u got edge on durrr 8tables hu
DrPill: or u play couse good game

Cole South: who knows edges in that game are going to be pretty thin no matter what
Cole South: either way its fun though, makes you a better player

DrPill: yes
Cole South: and i think whoever is playing their A game is going to win
Cole South: how are the NL guys on here these days?
Cole South: ive been playing a little bit the past few days
Cole South: to try to brush some rust off
Cole South: its fun

DrPill: hehe
DrPill: I think alot off players are overrated in nl
DrPill: here
DrPill: they play like 4 diffrent games on the same time
DrPill: then they tend to be more weak
DrPill: but what can I say im loosing to everyone
DrPill: il start talk again when im up couple mills

Cole South: lol
DrPill: hehe
Cole South: you play isildur?
DrPill: nahh
DrPill: we are friends and he is the best
DrPill is delusional. He thinks everyone on FTP is overrated, but he keeps on getting his ass handed to him. Ditto with Isildur1.

      
m