Quote:
Originally Posted by Flying Player
Been thinking the same thing for awhile. May be contingent on PokerStars getting more penetration in the US market though. They need to find a resolution to their issues in Nevada and get a successful outcome in California or have several other states regulate without restricting them. Unless of course they see this as a way to leverage themselves in. It would be hard for them to swallow operating WSOP.com through one of their competitors, if they would even be allowed to operate it at all.
Licensing/regulatory always front of mind for them. If you peel back the onion a bit its really not that big of a deal as it relates to operating online site.
We are currently only talking about NV and NJ. Amaya already licensed in NJ. Unlikely to get licensed any time soon in NV. So, NV online is the only thing a CI/WSOP owned by Amaya would lose. At the end of the day how important is NV online over short term or even the long term?
I am not sure what if any regulatory issues exist in an Amaya owned WSOPc live MTTs. The casinos that host are the licensee. Third party companies (also licensed) usually run and manage circuits.. WSOPc is really just a brand that the host casino uses.
I think a purchase helps legitimize Amaya in other states where bad actor clause is always a road block. WSOPC has economic benefit in each state with a stop. Lawmakers and voters and lobbyists like economic benefit, especially when it is actual and not just projected. Plus with CI/WSOP absorbed , one less group lobbying against Amaya in all the various states muddling through new potential online legislation.
Amaya owning the WSOP Main Event and WSOP Summer at Rio, is another matter. The WSOP brand is strong in this one. But Amaya already feels they can successfully implode the EPT and PCA brand and build a new one, so who knows.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flying Player
Part of the announcement was a new unified website that would allow preregistration/payment and presumably allow winnings to be deposited back into an account. This should in theory greatly reduce the need to carry cash back and forth.
.
Totally missed this one. pretty huge if they can pull that off. getting cash to and from tournies in your own currency is hard enough. Dealing with forex makes it even worse. A fully functional, global stars bank at each stop would be HUGE benefit for players, especially new fun players with little experience in such matters.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NerdSuperfly
i think it makes a lot more sense to 'sell' a poker holiday, rather than a ultimate grind experience. especially, if you target players, who might want to play their first live event.
.
all good points. they did hammer on the "fun" factor in all the recent changes.
with 20% payouts and other tour changes its pretty clear that Amaya is taking similar strategy for live MTT as they did with online VIP / rake / game changes last year. From Amaya business perspective, kind of hard to argue against their strat.
Amaya is building a tour with a bit more focus on fun players having fun... and a bit less focus on a tour where a reg can be a reg.
The new wave is coming, Smart, live MTT regs might who still want to show profit, might want to think less about GTO and more about why Hellmuth is GOAT at WSOP Rio. His play style in those large, fun player fields is almost anti GTO, but you cant argue about the positive results. but I am sure many will post he is just a fish on a 10-year heater !!
Last edited by PTLou; 08-25-2016 at 06:49 AM.