Quote:
Originally Posted by SGT RJ
If you know your ideas are generally not believed/understood or received well, might I suggest providing irrefutable evidence of your conclusions, or finding someplace where they would be received well?
/derail.
seriously though, just provide ANY reasonable evidence defending your conclusions. or just post unreasonable evidence defending them. this thread was way better when you were doing that.
can someone help me with a list of conclusions Gabe has made based on absolutely nothing:
top 10 LIVE are better than top 10 ONLINE (definitions needed, which EDD will never agree to unless they satisfy this thesis, regardless of how unreasonable)
he is 80% in a match (given the same parameters as his match with samoleus) in a LIVE setting against ANY PRIMARILY ONLINE player in the world.
claudia is the best female player in the world
gabe has the best final table % of any player in the world (not sure if this is exactly what he claimed)
the best players (per capita lmao) in the world are from Mississippi
casinos use infrared lasers to cheat
online poker is rigged against his account(s) specifically (not sure how many he claimed)
he had the most frequent player points on FTP during it's inception
and, for fun
he has busted Phil Ivey the only two times he has played with him, although Phil was clearly gambling because it was early on in the tournament
there are so many more, but i'm done for now. please, let's elaborate on this list and get this thread back on track.
Last edited by ucantcme63; 08-18-2011 at 04:50 PM.