Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players

08-04-2011 , 12:50 AM
haha no i already realize if you can't see the difference between dice rolls and poker there's no hope in me getting through to you. clearly i'm not opposing what a t-test does, i'm saying you are using it in the wrong context.

why don't you post your calculations of your results instead? show us this stat-101 lvl statistical proof that your results prove that you are a top tier player.

and then realize that in poker results have no meaning and you're running a statistical test on something that has no statistical significance.

edit: also so that i don't get nitpicked, obv meant no statistical significance in what you are trying to prove. which is that you are a "top player." so technically you are right if your subjective view of a "top player" is just someone who passes this t-test with their results.

Last edited by subiime; 08-04-2011 at 01:16 AM.
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
08-04-2011 , 12:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by samoleus
Can we try to keep the thread about the match so that there is every chance that it actually happens?

Quote:
Originally Posted by samoleus
Can we please go back to finalizing the match?

.
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
08-04-2011 , 12:54 AM
also gabe you can say what you want. but i just thought you were name dropping me to gain a bit of credibility in that last post of yours i quoted.

we will agree to disagree
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
08-04-2011 , 12:55 AM
Ya my business didn't do that well because I was actually telling clients to buy stupid stuff like gold $250 an ounce, international bonds that were getting 9 % coupons with double digit currency appreciation on top instead of telling them NASDAQ was going to 20,000 like other brokers. What was I thinking?


And I should have learned to type better on my iPhone while playing poker. Oh I'm making that up too since I don't really play.


Guessing Joseph cheong is actually doing calculations right now , HA
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
08-04-2011 , 12:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EDDtown
Ya my business didn't do that well because I was actually telling clients to buy stupid stuff like gold $250 an ounce, international bonds that were getting 9 % coupons with double digit currency appreciation on top instead of telling them NASDAQ was going to 20,000 like other brokers. What was I thinking?


And I should have learned to type better on my iPhone while playing poker. Oh I'm making that up too since I don't really play.


Guessing Joseph cheong is actually doing calculations right now
, HA
subtle racism
southern style
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
08-04-2011 , 01:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by siola
subtle racism
southern style
true but the question is whether its about me doing math (which wouldn't make sense bc all this t-test stuff was brought up by gabe) or whether its about me being subservient and following his orders to do said calculations
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
08-04-2011 , 01:16 AM
http://www.pokerforums.org/general-p...ed-thread.html

delusional in 2005. ^^^

still delusional in 2011.

Please respond to samoleus requests to get this HU match going.
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
08-04-2011 , 01:25 AM
Yep & those posters were saying the same things back then just like now, except none are still around to talk & here I am still taking there money in live games.


All of the winners then are gone because they were beneficiary of software code. None are around anymore unless playing .25 .50 nl on 100 deposit
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
08-04-2011 , 01:31 AM
Ah so that is what the doomswitch is?! One of the mods has a nifty little button which he can press if someone marked with a 'lose money' account is in the hand. Amazing
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
08-04-2011 , 01:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EDDtown
Yep & those posters were saying the same things back then just like now, except none are still around to talk & here I am still taking there money in live games.


All of the winners then are gone because they were beneficiary of software code. None are around anymore unless playing .25 .50 nl on 100 deposit
You had a hot run in small live MTTs in 2008 and you haven't done anything since. And you aren't exactly crushing live cash games from what I read. So what am I missing???
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
08-04-2011 , 01:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EDDtown
It was increasingly important in the early days of playing poker for parody because they players were extremely bad, Over the years most will learn to play a little & balance out the edge. If they had not run the sites like this in the beginning, We would have seen many of them shut down because of over supply from the Rounder's money maker boom, then sharks & house win all money. No players but sharks left. This process would have happened much quicker than it has.
You keep saying parody and it doesn't seem to make sense ... unless all of this is one big parody.

Do you mean parity.


Or am I missing something?
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
08-04-2011 , 01:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by subiime
and then realize that in poker results have no meaning and you're running a statistical test on something that has no statistical significance.

edit: also so that i don't get nitpicked, obv meant no statistical significance in what you are trying to prove. which is that you are a "top player." so technically you are right if your subjective view of a "top player" is just someone who passes this t-test with their results.
oops i'm using the words "statistical significance" wrong. i actually just meant "significance." been a long time since i did introductory statistics. anyway sent you the pm gabe, awaiting on the response so i can plug in variables run a statistical test and find out you were right all along.
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
08-04-2011 , 01:45 AM
Wow, you must really think the world is full of ******s when 99% of people disagree with everything you say.
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
08-04-2011 , 01:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meatballing
You had a hot run in small live MTTs in 2008 and you haven't done anything since. And you aren't exactly crushing live cash games from what I read. So what am I missing???


Sounds like your missing a lot. I think I mentioned that I didn't play tourneys in 09, & I ran a few thousand into 3/4 mill in Vegas last summer. I don't think anythings been mentioned about not winning live, so what are you suggesting
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
08-04-2011 , 04:01 AM
Hi.
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
08-04-2011 , 06:51 AM
Oh man... this thread...
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
08-04-2011 , 06:52 AM
Thread = level

Actuallly thought OP was serious for a second then I realized wtf...

/thread
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
08-04-2011 , 07:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EDDtown
Sounds like your missing a lot. I think I mentioned that I didn't play tourneys in 09, & I ran a few thousand into 3/4 mill in Vegas last summer. I don't think anythings been mentioned about not winning live, so what are you suggesting
I was merely suggesting that you support your baller lifestyle by being a man prostitute in the high roller gay circles and your hobbies are trolling and dildo sword fighting.

Last edited by Meatballing; 08-04-2011 at 07:21 AM. Reason: If someone thinks this post is offensive, you are homophobic since this post is only a tribute for the gay community!
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
08-04-2011 , 08:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lego05
You keep saying parody and it doesn't seem to make sense ... unless all of this is one big parody.

Do you mean parity.


Or am I missing something?
If he made that spelling mistake on purpose to subtly hint at leveling he's doing in this thread, them it would be genius. However, I think he's probably just a moron.
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
08-04-2011 , 08:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EDDtown
Yep & those posters were saying the same things back then just like now, except none are still around to talk & here I am still taking there money in live games.


All of the winners then are gone because they were beneficiary of software code. None are around anymore unless playing .25 .50 nl on 100 deposit
OK, 2p2ers, we can shutdown all the rigged threads. We've found the one that was cheated.

Seriously though, it would be so easy to demonstrate account bias in a statistically significant way, yet no one has been able to do it despite the millions of hands and accounts available for analysis. You have a severely warped view of how you ran and I'm afraid that your feeling of being rigged against just isn't mathematically robust enough for me to buy.

This whole thread makes sense now, though. You proved to be an inferior online player, so in an attempt to validate your career and skills you made this thread to assert live players just have something "extra" that most online players can't/haven't developed yet so they are superior. It's pretty amazingly transparent and I actually feel sorry for you. Trying to replace your parents' lost respect with admiration from an anonymous online forum must be a painfully lonely endeavor.
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
08-04-2011 , 08:55 AM
since OP was silly enough not to disclose his online screenname, but a quote related to that screenname instead, it was a simple step to find out what his screenname is:

stockman27

http://www.pokerforums.org/general-p...-thread-4.html

Edit: awesome OP in that thread by Gabe, lol.

Edit2: FTP/Stars sn's = stockman28

Last edited by Deurdy; 08-04-2011 at 09:04 AM.
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
08-04-2011 , 08:55 AM
Man I'm seriously so dissapointed this thread is a level

Either that or the OP is absolutely ******ed, and well, maybe it's a level without him knowing.

Anyways, pretty good level, probably one of the best on 2p2. congrats.
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
08-04-2011 , 09:12 AM
08-04-2011 , 10:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deurdy
Now you guys are just badmouthing, I think he played this fine.

I mean you don't want to raise with a 5 high flush, what if the other guy has a higher flush? Don't be results oriented.
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
08-04-2011 , 10:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Land Of The Free?
Now you guys are just badmouthing, I think he played this fine.

I mean, you don't want to raise with a 5 high flush, what if the other guy has a higher flush? Don't be results oriented.
Lol, of course he played it fine, and his hand even won. So how is it rigged against him?
I'm basically pointing out that he is extremely selective in his thin foil hat views that the software is rigged against him.
If it was rigged against him, how do these hands win, or why is he being dealt AA vs KK? Or is that something the software is even taking into consideration when rigging it against him?
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote

      
m