Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players

07-20-2011 , 11:32 AM
are you a live pro?
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-20-2011 , 11:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EDDtown
If you took the top 50 live pros & played against top 50 online pros for a year, the online players end up broke at the end of the period.
Well, if they play live poker for a year, the live poker pro's will win. If they play online poker for a year, the online players will win... Not sure what you call poker...

or let me explain it different... 2+2=4
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-20-2011 , 12:17 PM
There are many online players who crush live and online highstakes, same can't be said about the mainly live players.
Ivey,Dwan,Antonius etc all online crushers in my book.
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-20-2011 , 12:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pkz
obviously there is a huge fallacy in your argument. you claim that a pure online player could never be the best in the world. if he wanted to prove that he was he would have to play live according to you. ( i take it over a significant number of hands) if he does this succesfully like durr has, then you will just claim that ofcourse it is possible to cross over if you have a good feel for the game and that they have adapted. however, they are no longer a pure online player, hence it does not count. lol.

surely the best players in the world would be those that can play well both live and online, thereby maximising the ways they can make money, find action etc. I am pretty sure the players who rely on these so called "soulreads" would be absolutely atrocious online.
btw. i am sure i am sure that the live players you think are so great at reading tells get a lot more information from the line their opponent took(why is he betting here, it doen't makes sense etc) then they do fromsome kind of physical tell. seems online players should be better at this.
It's like a reverse no true scottsman fallacy.

No mostly online player could crush the highest stakes live.

[A mostly online player goes out and crushes said game].

Bah, he's no longer just an online guy since he added the live skills - no mostly online player could crush the game WITHOUT adding live skills to their game!

The argument can't be defeated - online guy loses at the highest stakes live, it's because online skill sets don't work live, and online guy wins at said stakes, it's because he added live skills.
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-20-2011 , 12:57 PM
The reason the best players play live is because easier money to be made.

I'm assuming the fat whales would much rather play in a casino, with 5star treatment, than sitting online playing at home.
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-20-2011 , 12:59 PM
Daliman, Bending the facts a little?

"Within 15 minutes he was already raise/4betting/cbet/ shoving turn bottom pair, inflating the living crap out of pots constantly with little regard for hand values or ranges, and losing ~5k in the span of 2 hours"

Really, I think I 4 bet a kid that reraised me because of one of the tells I've been speaking about, I had k6 off & he had 8 high when most of the money went in, he called $350 more with 78 with only about 700 more behind, of course when the flop came 468, the money is going in. That was after nitting it up for a while, it was the first play I made & I only made it because I saw when he talked himself into reraising, I knew he didnt have it. Also I lost around $3000 , If you don't recall I also flopped a flush against the same guy flop 710j, all diamonds, Me q8 diamonds in BB on straddled pot, Him Kx diamonds. I also did lose the hand you talked about, Lost the JJ to AJ on river ACE, Pretty bad luck for an hour or so I'd say.


"Probably cashed big in a few events, then thought he played for a living, without understanding what being a professional poker player is all about"

Also I'm actually a cash player & have been playing NL holdem since before it started in the casinos, I was playing for a living when limit poker was still the only game in town, So I was involved in No limit when the 1st games begin to spring up in the casinos, I've probably played close to as many NL live hands as anyone. Obviously wasn't around in the old PL holdem days, but were talking modern NL holdem (basically the past 10 years).

I also never played a tournament in my life until 2008 which I finished with more POY final tables than anyone, I've never considered myself a tournament player, although I do extremely well in them. I even listed on one of my profiles that I wished they would take the celebrity status away from tournament poker because the cash players make up the group of the best players. I've won at poker as consistently as anyone that's played the game so I think I know what its like to be a professional poker player.

Also the 5 10 game I played with you , I had 3000 on me, so I bought in short while I was waiting on my girlfriend to finish up a level in the main event, She got 85th by the way & Id put her up against you anyday, she's beat 25 50NL & 50 100 200 PLO against tough players, she just a protege of mine & could still beat you.
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-20-2011 , 01:32 PM
put the top 50 online pros vs the top 50 live pros for a year in a live setting and the online pros will not go broke. online pros have a little thing called bankroll management.
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-20-2011 , 01:35 PM
Evil - If there bankroll management is good, that would require them leaving the game entirely because they couldn't win
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-20-2011 , 01:37 PM
A lot of live players have a fear or randomness that manifests itself in weird ways. The more ridiculous manifestations would be asking for deck change or blaming the dealer (Hellmuth even has done this). Thinking you have more control than you actually do (via soul-reads) would be one of them imo. Esp the higher you go.

Also, I'm not convinced this isn't a massive level.
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-20-2011 , 01:42 PM
Egos, ITT

Overinflated, silicone-filled egos IMO
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-20-2011 , 01:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by legoshark2
The reason the best players play live is because easier money to be made.

I'm assuming the fat whales would much rather play in a casino, with 5star treatment, than sitting online playing at home.
no money online, everyone solid....big money in 1 tabling live 50/100 full ring games however
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-20-2011 , 01:46 PM
also, many of the Top 50 online players in the world are also in the Top 50 live players in the world, whole thread is stupid. It is based on something that is obv true but extrapolated to the point of being ******ed
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-20-2011 , 01:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EDDtown
Evil - If there bankroll management is good, that would require them leaving the game entirely because they couldn't win
you write like you're under 18
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-20-2011 , 01:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EDDtown
until 2008 which I finished with more POY final tables than anyone
has he explained what this means?
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-20-2011 , 01:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick Rivers
I'd be interested in hearing some thoughts on exactly what "live reads" are worth. Suppose you take two online players with a solid grasp of NLHE fundamentals, and a good understanding of advanced strategy on top of that. Both are winners online and have made the necessary strategic adjustments to win in live poker as well. Both players are good at concealing their physical tells. But, only one of the two has become an expert tell reader at live poker, with the other being largely oblivious to the tells given off by his opponents at the table. How much more is the expert tell reader going to make per hour than the guy with no tell reading ability? If the non-reader is good enough to make, say, $350/hour at 25/50, how much is the tell reading expert going to make, given that his skills are otherwise on par with those of the non-reader? $400? $500? Less? More?
Just before he left the table, I got in a ~$3500 hand (not vs him) where I raised the flop, and he started talking about how you can always tell if someone has it or mot by the bands around the irises. I obv covered up my eyes at this point, stacked the guy in the hand, and GC started crowing abut how he knew I had it, and how he shouldn't have told us all about it because that one tell alone is worth half a million dollars.

So it appears the ledger looks like this:

Bands of irises: $500000 +
Twisting and listening to Oreo: ~$50000
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-20-2011 , 01:55 PM
sunglasses + hoodie and suddenly I can beat anybody in the world b/c they won't be able to read me
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-20-2011 , 02:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EDDtown
Daliman, Bending the facts a little?

"Within 15 minutes he was already raise/4betting/cbet/ shoving turn bottom pair, inflating the living crap out of pots constantly with little regard for hand values or ranges, and losing ~5k in the span of 2 hours"

Really, I think I 4 bet a kid that reraised me because of one of the tells I've been speaking about, I had k6 off & he had 8 high when most of the money went in, he called $350 more with 78 with only about 700 more behind, of course when the flop came 468, the money is going in. That was after nitting it up for a while, it was the first play I made & I only made it because I saw when he talked himself into reraising, I knew he didnt have it. Also I lost around $3000 , If you don't recall I also flopped a flush against the same guy flop 710j, all diamonds, Me q8 diamonds in BB on straddled pot, Him Kx diamonds. I also did lose the hand you talked about, Lost the JJ to AJ on river ACE, Pretty bad luck for an hour or so I'd say.


"Probably cashed big in a few events, then thought he played for a living, without understanding what being a professional poker player is all about"

Also I'm actually a cash player & have been playing NL holdem since before it started in the casinos, I was playing for a living when limit poker was still the only game in town, So I was involved in No limit when the 1st games begin to spring up in the casinos, I've probably played close to as many NL live hands as anyone. Obviously wasn't around in the old PL holdem days, but were talking modern NL holdem (basically the past 10 years).

I also never played a tournament in my life until 2008 which I finished with more POY final tables than anyone, I've never considered myself a tournament player, although I do extremely well in them. I even listed on one of my profiles that I wished they would take the celebrity status away from tournament poker because the cash players make up the group of the best players. I've won at poker as consistently as anyone that's played the game so I think I know what its like to be a professional poker player.

Also the 5 10 game I played with you , I had 3000 on me, so I bought in short while I was waiting on my girlfriend to finish up a level in the main event, She got 85th by the way & Id put her up against you anyday, she's beat 25 50NL & 50 100 200 PLO against tough players, she just a protege of mine & could still beat you.
Pretty good read by me, huh?

Btw, how does "Most of the $$$ go in with 8 high" when he has $700 more behind. Even your faulty memory is incorrect, as that wouldn't be "most of the $$$". When you 4bet him from the button or CO I specifically remember him asking how much you had, and you said you started the hand around $1500 and he had you covered. You made it 30 or 40, he made it like 140, you made it 350ish. Flop came out J86, you bet like 400, he called, turn 9, you shoved, he called with 78 since he was now open ended. Not saying he played the hand great, but you delude yourself by changing the details.

I don't want to get into a whole dismantling of your argument piece by piece, although I obv could, as I did that day, but you're like 34 years old. HTF do you think you have played "close to as many NL live hands as anyone"? You've won at poker as "consistently as anyone that's played the game" and you're 34? Do you even understand the fallacy of your statement? And don't even get me started about your girlfriend, Claudia Crawford, who made one of the most horrible plays I have ever seen in tournament poker, a play so bad I actually made a specific comment about it 4 days ago!, one of the only hands I posted myself, it was so bad. I will play her anytime, anywhere, for any stakes I can afford, and I could almost certainly get backed for stakes I can't. NL hold'em only tho, I don't play PLO (yet). I guess you're of the opinion I suck at poker, which is fine; you're not the first.

Like I said before, you seem like a nice enough guy, you just need to lay off all the conspiracy theories and learn not to inflate the living crap out of EVERY SINGLE pot you play, just because you "have a read". Folding to a 3bet is ok, even when you think your opponent is light. Listen to people who have different opinions than you, because none of us know all the answers. As I have said for many years, being good at poker isn't even in the top 5 skills needed to be a professional poker player.

PM me anytime to set that game up with your girl, btw.
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-20-2011 , 02:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ucantcme63
has he explained what this means?
He ran hot in 2008
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-20-2011 , 02:29 PM
Op plays low stakes and has 4.9 k careeer earning. But he's a soul reading live sharks who final tabled 60% of the time everytime. Dont **** with him u online punk he will stare into ur soul.
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-20-2011 , 02:34 PM
OP,

do you mind making a list of top ten live players? Doyle? Hellmuth?

Also if your statement is true, how come in the past few years even live tournaments were dominated by online pros?
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-20-2011 , 02:37 PM
your GF has a nice rack, grats
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-20-2011 , 02:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny Chase
Op plays low stakes and has 4.9 k careeer earning. But he's a soul reading live sharks who final tabled 60% of the time everytime. Dont **** with him u online punk he will stare into ur soul.
You looked up the wrong guy. He DOES have some nice results.

Gabe Costner
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-20-2011 , 03:25 PM
Quote:
The reason for this is pretty simple, In live play tells come into play.
Literally stopped reading here. Another non-professional (or live 1/2nl grinder) recreatinoal fan interjecting his baseless opinion. Nothing to see here.

edit: Just realized OP is the same guy that was raving about physical tells in the previous thread, no surprise. I thought it was just another person as blatantly wrong as the last guy, turns out it's just the same guy wasting space on the forum with his delusions.
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-20-2011 , 03:36 PM
Phil Ivey does both. Close thread
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-20-2011 , 03:50 PM
Sometimes I wonder if a guy like boobies4me has a thinking mind at all. Where do you come from? Are you a poker player?


Are you really saying that live tells are not part of the game?

And are you saying that someone that's accomplished what I have in poker doesn't deserve an opinion & isnt a poker player at all? I'm curious just what your reason for posting at all other than to fill up some space in your life.
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote

      
m