Greetings friends & degens,
I shall attempt to explain why LIVE will always > ONLINE. Will try to keep concise.
Financial POV
From a financial perspective obviously, there is little difference, save for the increasing probability of RTA - which for the sake of the argument I'll not discuss here except to mention it's obv a HUGE problem.
The only relevant financial element I can think of is game selection: game selection live vs online is almost always incomparably better. Purely from a bb/100 POV, you will not be able to compete w/ a live pro who game selects and has soft skills - regardless of the skill difference between the two of you.
Purity/ Feel POV
Obviously software tools
fundamentally modify how the game is played:
- memory (mental and/or physical note-taking that you'd need in live) is effectively replaced by software, which has 100% data accuracy; this is a small but significant skill of poker that is non-existent in online, making the game less
- soft skill element (live reads) almost entirely removed: when you play live you can _easily_ (depending on your psych profiling skills) mentally assess,
tag and exploit players based on a bunch of imperfect yet signif info (how they look, talk, behave etc); another element that online removes, again making the game less
Cheating/ collusion is
much easier/ common online than it is live (in a casino/ card room setting).
Also having physical chips & cards in your hands >>> playing from a laptop (lol).
For all these reasons,
LIVE will always > ONLINE.
I thank you for your attention.