Quote:
Originally Posted by MicroRoller
Don't forget that the board members owned about 38% of the company. 17% of the owners owned 38% of the company and had more power and involvement (at least should have) than the other owners. The board only needed to convince an additional 13% of ownership to get a majority. That seems like an uphill battle for the non board owners.
The board may have been more than just ineffective as well. Lederer claims that he and Ferguson found out around April 7th or so that there was a big hole due to phantom deposits but then later indicates that the other shareholders didn't know until after the SHTF on Black Friday. There's one instance of the board keeping something from the other owners so it's not unthinkable that there would be more.
Good work.
The one omission I've seen is the fact that Bitar informed Lederer about the backlog on April 7th, personally, after neglecting to disclose that little factoid during the prior two days of Board meetings. That failure to disclose, at that late a date, should have been grounds for Bitar's immediate dismissal. It cost the BOD two crucial days of action while they were in Dublin. The failure to swiftly act against Bitar is damning of the BOD. It implies Bitar was working with their tacit approval.
What is also missing is the follow up to Howard's Cash on Hand Report (first mentioned in Part 2). Howard stated that this report was assembled monthly. Was it cooked?
Billman has contributed some outstanding observations to this thread, particularly Lederer's silence on the financial meltdown, which occurred on his watch as a Director, and attempts to focus the discussion towards his heroic efforts after he screwed up. Howard the leader of the BOD. Ferguson may have been the chair, but Lederal was the leader. He doesn't get to claim he didn't know. He backed, to the hilt, the guy who wrecked the company. Whether Lederer knew FTP was bleeding cash is irrelevant. He was supposed know. That was his job.
My last observation brings a bit of pop culture into the discussion. As it pertains to Lindgren, Ivy, Dwan. All these obstructors who are being used to distract blame. Their various perceived transgressions were dwarfed by the gaping hole in the balance sheet. A hole that doomed the company. Who has seen Oliver Stone's JFK? Anybody read Jim Garrison's book --
On the Trail of the Assassins -- off of which Stone's movie was partially based? Anybody remember Stone's CIA spook (Donald Sutherland's character), who was helping Kevin Costner (Garrison)? Well, in the book, the Sutherland character was actually a CIA plant whose role was to gather intel on Garrison's investigation and plant disinformation that would lead the investigation astray.
Well, that's what Lederer is trying to do here. He's spreading disinformation (or simply irrelevant information) to spread the blame and take attention away from the 1+ year period leading up to Black Friday rather and, instead, focused it upon the 1+ year following Black Friday. When, really, the only questions are how did ~$300 million of player deposits disappear and why weren't their checks-n-balances in place to ensure transparency?