No but not doubt anskys eyebrows are furred as ****. Do u remember when he was outraged when the Amaya stars changes finally affected him and he got mad and flew out to Amaya hq to get wine and dined and to sign an NDA?

While I appreciate the confidence, I have no interest in getting involved, sorry. Like, none.

That's not how this works. 2+2 isn't here to facilitate your strange Nash knowledge e-peen contest. If you can somehow pull that off in an existing appropriate thread, that's fine, but you don't get to post about it wherever you think it gets the most publicity. At this point, I'd say your lucky this thread is still open as stiff like this sure isn't related to NVG.

Your lack of self awareness is quite something.

Hint:

I dont' know why you don't have a sense of humor, and you have chance to judge me hard. You can make a fool of me.

Ideal Poker is a generalization of Nash's Ideal Money and then specifically applied to poker 'with loss of generality'.

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/s...93&postcount=1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Withou..._of_generality

By giving the single instance of application (poker being the most obvious) I showed that it can be applied to MANY networks/fields.

Just watch.

Not a day goes by that I don’t reminisce bout it

Here we go again

No this isn't how banks work. Not at all.

The credit commercial banks (ie not the fed) create isn't cash money. Its credit money. You don't understand this subject. And I am THE expert on it.

We can consider poker sites pay interest on deposits if we consider winrates as the interest rates. Of course interest COULD be negative for a savings account at a bank right?

With that I believe I have successfully ported the fractional reserve banking framework to poker sites.

Wow. We're lucky to have you then.

No, we really can't.

luck is a funny word to use
well at first it might seem unrelatable. after all the player has to do some work, and thats not really the point of a savings account. so from that perspective its not. But thats just a framework.

I'm pointing to/from a different framework. We see this framework when considering which site to play in a world where all other things are equal, or rather that there is a type of standard (this standard doesn't exist so its hypothetical in my work) that allows one to compare their winrates on a given site. So if i make 7% on site A versus %5 on site B its as if i want to store my savings for a return.

This later makes more sense when we start to consider why we even store money on a site in a bankroll at all...

I make the conjecture that rake for online poker (sites) is targeted to be at the level that no player has a positive expectation, and no less.