I ask Jason: Is OP using a bot.
Jason answer (at best): I don't know for sure yes or no
I ask Jason: Would you play OP on the app
Jason answer: no

I thank Jason and decline the challenge offer from OP. If you want better than this, you have to prove to Jason otherwise. It's on you, not on him.

Please name 1 person i haven't paid. Oh your can't? You have no clue what you re talking about. There's no unsettled balance with OP to be clear.

Nolan Dalla might be interested in this. This woman is/was obviously money hungry, hungry enough to blackmail him for $100k...

mic drop

Comeback zero chance

What a brutal takedown


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

OP just could have spoken to JM private and showed him his skills or just be quite ... but i have to say, that was entertaining

I want to make it clear that when I stated that playing Jason live would not prove anything does not imply I would not play him. I would definitely play him, but I would much rather play him in a format that proves something. I don’t think that having communicated to Jason, “hey let’s play live so you can see I am not cheating” would have been effective, as his opinion probably would not have changed in a few live sessions had I won, and definitely would not have changed had I lost. Even had he changed his opinion and addressed it to the 20-30 people that he had told, it is unlikely that those 20-30 people would have subsequently told everyone that they had spread the news that I'm cheating to that Jason's opinion had changed. Therefore, the only way to address this whole problem was by going public. Consequently, I propose to Jason we play a 10k hand challenge at 100/pt. Fantasy lands would be considered extensional to each hand. I am willing to go to Florida or Las Vegas to play him face to face on the app. I can interchange accounts on app with him or make a new one. Jason has the burden of proof by telling 20-30 people I am cheating, however, I am proposing this challenge to try to disprove his conclusion. Also I want to make it clear that me looking like a live beginner was only during the PCA, I have played Natasha countless of times after the PCA and I am sure I am up points against her not counting the first time we played during PCA.

dude just stop lol its clear something is up and your not on the level so why the heck would he waste his time playing you, anyone who plays you or Jaclyn at this point in time is a fool

ITT: children accuse other children of cheating in a game because they're sore losers. Innocent until proven guilty I say.

It's kind of sick that these kinds of accusations occur in poker games that are completely unsolved i.e. PLO dream machines etc. Let alone a solved game. I wonder how HU limit players deal with their business..

You heard wrong - I was never broke (or as you put it "went from having no money"), reading that made me laugh. I am sitting here looking through all my OFC records. You are correct in that I moved up in the stakes that I was playing over time. I did this for the same reasons that most players move up in stakes: my skill level increased and as a result my bankroll increased.

The very first person I played for $ on the app was at $5/point in July of 2015. By August of 2015 I was already being accused of cheating (which is funny as I was NOT very good back then, but was better than my opponent which is all that matters in this game.) I remember distinctly sitting in a live cash game when a reg told me that this OFC opponent felt that the guy I was dating at the time was playing for me on the app. Another reg at the table verified that he too had heard this. I got upset, one of them said "you should take it as a complement" and I subsequently decided to address the opponent directly. He told me "I didn't really mean that, I was just tilted" and we moved on. (Fwiw, ironically my exboyfriend was not an OFC player at that time. Hooray for misogyny. How could a girl possibly win?)

The only reason I am bringing up this story is because a year and a half later, the same opponent accused me of cheating again, as your rumor had spread to him. He then went on to tell me that if I gave him back everything he lost to me at $10 a point, he would not spread the rumor any further, but that if I did not, he would spread it. (He said all of this in writing, in texts.) I responded that I would happily play him live for everything he lost. He ignored my offer. A couple of months later, he blew up my phone again, calling me a cheater and threatening that if I didn't stop playing "his friends" on the app he would tell them that I was cheating. For the second time, I told him he was welcome to play me live for everything that he had lost... and for the second time, he ignored my offer. Again, all this is documented in writing should he decide to post on here and dispute any of it.

Luckily, the friends of a different opponent who I beat on the app have proposed a situation where we play live (I am leaving out names here as I have not asked anyone's permission to use their name.) This opponent and I have been texting and although the exact parameters of the game have not been set up, it is looking like it will take place in Florida some time after the LAPC. I would hope that his (or his friends') assessment of the game and of my skill level will be posted somewhere so that my name can be, to some extent, cleared from this matter. Unfortunately, it will never be completely cleared as is the nature of this kind of thing.

Jason, you're right, for the most part I will play anyone. There is also a list of people I won't play (I don't think posting it would serve any purpose) and I won't play them because from the information I have, I think they are better than me or that in some cases, our skill levels are similar enough that it would be a waste of both parties time.

In looking through my records there are three people who have beaten me for a semi-significant number of points. As I put in more hands, discussed strategy with others (Fernando included), and found other public resources designed to improve one's game, I felt confident enough to rechallenge these three people. One declined. One accepted and we are currently playing now (I have been ahead the entire time since our rematch.) The third player played me for a short period and then quit, indicating to me that he didn't feel comfortable with how quickly my level of play had changed. I wasn't upset about this as I saw his perspective... so I moved on... and challenged more people, and beat more people, and since Fernando is a friend of mine rumors of him cheating were linked to me. In addition to more than a dozen regular opponents quitting me, much like Fernando, about a half dozen agreed to play me and then backed out (presumably after talking to Jason or Natasha, as 100% of them have known ties to them.) I can't overstate how much these rumors have hurt my action and reputation. Do I think this entire thing is unfair? Of course. But life isn't fair.

Take away point: I will be playing someone I beat on the app live. I am confident in my game and thus I am not going to lose sleep over this.

Additionally, if Jason accepts Fernando's live challenge, I am willing to take side action as I am confident Fernando is a huge favorite to win.

I'd watch a PPV of the 4 playing OFC pineapple.

I've been playing against Fernando on the app for small stakes ($1/pt) for about a year and a half. We have mostly played races to 200 points. Over that time, I'm up 486 points on him over thousands of hands. I was up 1139 points before a recent death run where I couldn't make a hand to save my life and ran extremely bad (like 4.5/14/28 on the app for a few hundred hands vs lifetime average of 6.1/21.4/21.3). If he's cheating, I don't think he's very good at it, and certainly wasting a lot of time to lose a few hundred to me over the course of a year and a half...I can't prove anything one way or the other, but that's just my 2 cents.

the whole OFC thing is so weird to me (how people get action - not the actual game)

FWIW, when I played vs Natasha at WSOP I thought she was the fish, but hey, maybe I'm the fish....who knows. #variance

If you had a cheating app would be pretty smart to lose at low stakes and get a good rep then play regs for higher points and crush them.

Didn't Shaun Deeb also believe some people were cheating on the app?

So Mr/Mrs Mercier come on here and still accuse you of cheating BUT cannot prove in any way that you are, "you just never lose".Obviously they spread rumours to other players killing action and Shaun Deeb for some reason calls your friend out on twitter.


What a stand up couple Stars/Hard Rock employs...I really don't understand their reasoning behind their accusations. It's not kosher to accuse someone of the worst possible thing in the poker community with ZERO evidence.

Seems like this doesn't really require much drama but rather a bunch of live OFC action to resolve

pretty clear cut and easy imho

Possibly.

Or I believe another brands app ABC that first became popular allegedly had holes or exploits in the software that made cheating possible.

It is totally kosher to let your friends know you suspect someone is cheating when your friend asks you if they should take action from someone on the app. Ridiculous to think otherwise. They weren't going around shouting from the rooftops that these people are cheaters and shouldn't be trusted. They were giving their honest opinion to people who asked them.

this seems like a pretty reasonable way to prove that you're not cheating on the app

LOL, well played OP, great idea to start this thread! I'm sure you'll be getting tons more action now.

Of course I would tell my friends, I also think Jason/Natasha are extreme degens and hate losing in anything given their "status".

The point is you can't spread rumours/gossip about someone being a cheater without ANY evidence, makes you just seem like a sore loser.

+1 to sore loser'ing and ridiculous fanboy dickriding itt

evidence of cheating is pretty slim at this point, and a reasonable challenge has been issued. of course the person making the accusation has already pre-emptively quit the thread, so yea. fairly weak.