Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
**** January High Stakes Thread **** **** January High Stakes Thread ****

01-01-2010 , 10:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by handbag86
"when you see me on my poker account, thats when you know its me..."

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/29...beware-665197/

Also: TheItalienStyle down quite a bit it seems...hopefully all the talk that Blom90 is Isildur1 is not true :S
01-01-2010 , 10:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DiegoSanchez
"when you see me on my poker account, thats when you know its me..."
Yea but would he be playing 50/100 with brian hastings? (i don't know what he usually plays ??? )
01-01-2010 , 10:46 PM
annnd TheItalienStyle is busto.......
01-01-2010 , 11:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ben wb
I'd say isildur's English was generally better than yours tbh. isildur and theitalienstyle's chat is very similar.
Yhea, i know that...maybe because i'm not isildur...
01-02-2010 , 01:06 AM
Browndogg plays much higher than 50-100 at times and is easily the nicest guy to ever play nosebleeds. He's a helluva player as well, very surprised FTP hasn't signed him.
Good tourney player, plays the highest stakes at time and won the 25k hu championship this year... just my 2 cents
01-02-2010 , 01:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by F ******
How can you beat PA at 200/400 PLO and lose to everyone else at 500/1000? Isn't PA like the best PLO player?
durrr is just a plo fish, plain and simple
01-02-2010 , 01:42 AM
Interesting that there is no OMGclayaiken or urindanger on that list,

both are break-even for 2009.
01-02-2010 , 02:03 AM
ivey and antonius on top completely dominating thats pretty awesome. wasnt antonius down acouple mill too early in the year.
01-02-2010 , 02:27 AM
eli elezra won money in 2009?
01-02-2010 , 02:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony Eusebio
durrr is just a plo fish, plain and simple
its hard to make that judgement after only 400,000 hands. Do you have any idea of the variance involved in poker? theres only 2 ways we will know if durrrr is a winner in plo:

1) wait til hes played 100 million hands
2) wait til hes ran hot and turned his loss into a profit
01-02-2010 , 03:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by thatpfunk
plo is ****ing nuts
fyp
01-02-2010 , 04:02 AM
Since when are random 30k pot PLO hands Postworthy ? no wonder these threads get so f'in big. Should be a rule only post hands of >75k pots IMO
01-02-2010 , 05:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by peterpjames
eli elezra won money in 2009?
You should play him in mixed games.
01-02-2010 , 06:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony Eusebio
durrr is just a plo fish, plain and simple
So by doubling the stakes durrrr just becomes more fishy? I'm starting to think he's not the luckbox that some people on this forum make him out to be if he wins the challenge.

Even though most people view the challenge as whatevers It made me respect his PLO game, Antonius just kills everyone else.

Maybe the stakes are so low to PA that he doesn't care about 200/400? Man I don't know, when you are winning 1,000,000 a day I'm sure getting 3 to 1 on 500,000 isn't much to a team full tilt member..maybe that's it...
01-02-2010 , 06:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony Eusebio
durrr is just a plo fish, plain and simple
just read every post that bottomset made in this thread...
01-02-2010 , 06:55 AM
I guess Tonny Eusebio is such a PLO chrusher?
01-02-2010 , 07:09 AM
sarcasm? look at the piece i quoted

lol @ you people
01-02-2010 , 11:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pork Fri Rize
Since when are random 30k pot PLO hands Postworthy ? no wonder these threads get so f'in big. Should be a rule only post hands of >75k pots IMO
Chill out, brah. The 'rule' is 50bb + and given that 50/100 is consider High Stakes, that entails even $5k pots, though I tend to post 100bb and up and the said hands are 300-1000 big blind hands. Plus when **** is slow, something needs to stir up conversation and a lot of the $30k pots are played with more finesse than the $75k. It's not only about the gambollllllll
01-02-2010 , 12:05 PM
Full Tilt Poker $40/$80 No Limit Hold'em - 4 players
The Official 2+2 Hand Converter Powered By DeucesCracked.com

Volody512345 (BB): $6538.00
variance_LOOL (CO): $18304.00
Himan33 (BTN): $10124.00
Denoking (SB): $23380.50

Pre Flop: ($120.00)
1 fold, Himan33 raises to $240, 1 fold, Volody512345 calls $160

Flop: ($520.00) K 5 J (2 players)
Volody512345 checks, Himan33 bets $420, Volody512345 raises to $1780, Himan33 requests TIME, Himan33 calls $1360

Turn: ($4080.00) 5 (2 players)
Volody512345 bets $4518 all in, Himan33 calls $4518

River: ($13116.00) T (2 players - 1 is all in)

Final Pot: $13116.00
Volody512345 shows K J (two pair, Kings and Jacks)
Himan33 shows K A (two pair, Kings and Fives)
Volody512345 wins $13114.00
(Rake: $2.00)

Last edited by Jamie Platinum; 01-02-2010 at 12:07 PM. Reason: Another fun but small hand
01-02-2010 , 12:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bottomset
jesus you are dense, the point is he's breakeven buyin wise but down money because he's lost at the highest stakes, generally vs the same player base as what he played at 200/400(and he's up 900k vs PA at hu 200/400 for example)

no one is saying that his graph by $$ doesn't look awful, but it looks massively different than the graph by BB

I guess expecting nvgtards like you to understand something that simple is way too much to ask

both his plo and nlhe are within +- 5buyins of 0 aka a 225k breakeven stretch, where he lost at the wrong stakes, I mean if you switch it around and he ran good at 500/1k and lost at 200/400 and was up 4.5M its not like he's massively better, just fortunate to run good at the biggest stakes while in a breakeven BB stretch
bottomset owns
01-02-2010 , 01:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by drnkyourmlkshk
Browndogg plays much higher than 50-100 at times and is easily the nicest guy to ever play nosebleeds. He's a helluva player as well, very surprised FTP hasn't signed him.
Good tourney player, plays the highest stakes at time and won the 25k hu championship this year... just my 2 cents
Hi Andrew
01-02-2010 , 01:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamie Platinum
Chill out, brah. The 'rule' is 50bb + and given that 50/100 is consider High Stakes, that entails even $5k pots, though I tend to post 100bb and up and the said hands are 300-1000 big blind hands. Plus when **** is slow, something needs to stir up conversation and a lot of the $30k pots are played with more finesse than the $75k. It's not only about the gambollllllll
Don't acknowledge their crap JS. Your work is amazing and we appreciate you. Even if da pots aren't a gazzillion dollars at the end
01-02-2010 , 03:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bottomset
jesus you are dense, the point is he's breakeven buyin wise but down money because he's lost at the highest stakes, generally vs the same player base as what he played at 200/400(and he's up 900k vs PA at hu 200/400 for example)

no one is saying that his graph by $$ doesn't look awful, but it looks massively different than the graph by BB

I guess expecting nvgtards like you to understand something that simple is way too much to ask

both his plo and nlhe are within +- 5buyins of 0 aka a 225k breakeven stretch, where he lost at the wrong stakes, I mean if you switch it around and he ran good at 500/1k and lost at 200/400 and was up 4.5M its not like he's massively better, just fortunate to run good at the biggest stakes while in a breakeven BB stretch
doesn't the fact that the sample size at 5/1k is way bigger than the 2/4 sample size make a difference in the analysis? Maybe he is running well in the challenge? Also they were buying in for 80k in the 2/4 challenge so that also changes the numbers. Too many discrepancies anyhow to be conclusive.
01-02-2010 , 04:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Koshur
doesn't the fact that the sample size at 5/1k is way bigger than the 2/4 sample size make a difference in the analysis? Maybe he is running well in the challenge? Also they were buying in for 80k in the 2/4 challenge so that also changes the numbers. Too many discrepancies anyhow to be conclusive.
deep play = more skill involved.
01-02-2010 , 05:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Koshur
doesn't the fact that the sample size at 5/1k is way bigger than the 2/4 sample size make a difference in the analysis? Maybe he is running well in the challenge? Also they were buying in for 80k in the 2/4 challenge so that also changes the numbers. Too many discrepancies anyhow to be conclusive.
he has a winrate of just under 4BB/100 right now in the challenge, its conceivable but unlikely that his edge(if it exists) is that big

a good chunk of the challenge was played with 100bb stacks, also a lot of 500/1k was very deep, I'm not sure the average effective stacksize for each level but I'd guess it was reasonably similar

      
m