Quote:
Originally Posted by TheTactician
So why don't FT just add some non-Gus PLO 500/1000 tables, as all of the high stakes regs want them? What's the downside for them? Don't get it.
assuming the rake is the same:
it would take longer for you to lose all your money at lower stakes, thus bringing in more rake to FT.
if we played HU for rolls at .5-1 it would take 85,000 hands
if we flipped for rolls at 25/50 it would take like 4-5 hands and be way less rake.
I doubt HSPLO and HSNL bring in that much rake. I think they should just open up bigger games, but who knows why they do what they do.