Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Hughes
Micon...In all your posts and especially that embarrassing video, you come across as a self-unaware, mother****ing cartoon. You are the absolute super-nerd trapped in High School without a single clue as to how you come across to others.
That video alone excludes you and Brandon from holding public office, any serious corporate job, entrance to any self-respecting law school. It gets you a life time of ridicule, and the hatred of all the women. Everytime you get ripped off, it is big-time dumb on your part. Stealing documents or violating the privacy act against accused but unconvicted people is chicken-****, unAmerican, and against the laws. Nobody can sue you because you can't get blood out of a turnip. No insult to turnips intended.
A driver's licence or a police card is the property of the state, not the individual. It is a government document.
Johnny Hughes
Johnny, I would be very interested in hearing how Micon has violated the "privacy act against accused but unconvicted people". In fact, I would be interested in a citation to such an act. I am (vaguely) aware of the privacy act of 1974, but as far as I can tell such legislation has nothing to do with accused but unconvicted people (in fact, court records, which could clearly apply to accused but uncovicted people, are not covered by the privacy act of 1974) and in any case, surely you aren't claiming that Micon has violated the privacy act of 1974 which would clearly be inapplicable to his actions here.
Also, I may not be aware of all the facts, but I am hard pressed to see, based on what I've heard so far, how Micon would be considered guilty of theft. Please explain.
You may very well be right that a sherrifs card is the property of the state, but I am unaware of the statutory baisis for such a claim. Again, could you point me to the factual basis for that assertion? The fact that it may be a "government document" surely does not in itself cause it to be the property of the government. For instance if I just happened to have a copy of the Edwin Meese report on pornography, I'm pretty sure that copy would belong to me and not the government and I could make paper airplanes out of its pages if I so choose, with no repercussions coming from the govermnent as "owner". Again, I have no basis to dispute your authoritative statement that a sherrif's card belongs to the government, but I would be interested in the source of that claim.