My time has come to write sad stories without a happy ending. In May last year, a four-digit amount in US dollars was stolen from my account. Quickly wrote a statement to the police, oddly enough, a criminal case was opened there. True, there is no investigation for 1.5 years, although this is a completely different story.
In parallel, wrote in support of Skrill. Hot on the heels it was possible to establish that the money went to the account issued for invalid data. Although earlier this payment, which was completely insolent from impunity, introduced mandatory user verification.
Correspondence with Skrill to the constructive result did not accept - only the user and no one else could be to blame for their negligence. Therefore, I post this post to warn the community.
In addition, recently appeared such a curious video, shedding light on what is happening. I wonder who is the beneficiary of the Skrill crimes and who covers them !?
Declarations about the crime in financial monitoring were left without an adequate response, as usual. So, now is the coolest time for a public discussion of the crime committed. I am sure there are far more victims than criminal cases.
Attention, question to experts:
1) In which international institutions to write and who can help with the drafting of the text of documents?
Please share! If you have a skrill account, don’t waste your time, rather, withdraw money, because these foreign criminals do not care about the safety of your savings.
My time has come to write sad stories without a happy ending. In May last year, a four-digit amount in US dollars was stolen from my account. Quickly wrote a statement to the police, oddly enough, a criminal case was opened there. True, there is no investigation for 1.5 years, although this is a completely different story.
In parallel, wrote in support of Skrill. Hot on the heels it was possible to establish that the money went to the account issued for invalid data. Although earlier this payment, which was completely insolent from impunity, introduced mandatory user verification.
Correspondence with Skrill to the constructive result did not accept - only the user and no one else could be to blame for their negligence. Therefore, I post this post to warn the community.
In addition, recently appeared such a curious video, shedding light on what is happening. I wonder who is the beneficiary of the Skrill crimes and who covers them !?
Declarations about the crime in financial monitoring were left without an adequate response, as usual. So, now is the coolest time for a public discussion of the crime committed. I am sure there are far more victims than criminal cases.
Attention, question to experts:
1) In which international institutions to write and who can help with the drafting of the text of documents?
Please share! If you have a skrill account, don’t waste your time, rather, withdraw money, because these foreign criminals do not care about the safety of your savings.
Read my recent post in nvg thread poker stars stole my funds or similar title it has 4 or five stars so it should be easy to find, and was in a very recent response to Josem who worked for stars security after the UB/AP scandals. It recaps a similar experience that happened to a number of us around the same time. One vip settled for half his 20k as full and final settlement. I was given no such offer on my missing 6 k. I eventually appealed to the uk banking ombudsman. It took 13 months but I got A full refund plus 9% interest for every year the money was missing. Skrll tried to rely on the fact that the last log on was displayed clearly and that I should have noticed. As I was on a SKYPE group where we were constantly making swaps, depositing on different sites, withdrawing from different sites multiple times daily which my record showed, I won my case. As I could not have reasonably been expected to notice this anomoly. I go into more detailin the stars thread. The real meat is in the two or three threads in internet poker a few years ago. I’ll see if I can find the links. If Skrill is still uk based it is covered by the FRA which at the time could have been the FSA. They have an ombudsman to deal with disputes like this. The proper place for this thread is probably internet Poker. I can see why you posted to a bigger audience though. If I can find the links I’ll post them. The common theme was that they were all unique passwords guessed first time. I got a security token vey soon after. I now have some sort of 2fa on any site that has any money on it or could link to said site. Ryan from husng even ran a story on my case. As the little guy took on the big online bank and won. The time I spent e mailing the ombudsman answering questions etc was well worth the close to 7k I got back.
There are many threads about this starting at the end of 2013 and ending at the end of 2014 in the internet poker forum. Do an advanced search using my name as poster and Skrill as a key word. Make sure to select older than a month or you’ll just see my recent post in the stars thread. There were many conspiracy theories at the time, some credible, some not. But it will no doubt bear a similarity to your case. I thing there were up to 10 in the SKYPE group we victims made at the time. I was the only one to pursue it through the ombudsman at the time and the only one to get a full refund with interest. I don’t play so much now but at the time that was about a third of my roll.
My time has come to write sad stories without a happy ending. In May last year, a four-digit amount in US dollars was stolen from my account. Quickly wrote a statement to the police, oddly enough, a criminal case was opened there. True, there is no investigation for 1.5 years, although this is a completely different story.
In parallel, wrote in support of Skrill. Hot on the heels it was possible to establish that the money went to the account issued for invalid data. Although earlier this payment, which was completely insolent from impunity, introduced mandatory user verification.
Correspondence with Skrill to the constructive result did not accept - only the user and no one else could be to blame for their negligence. Therefore, I post this post to warn the community.
In addition, recently appeared such a curious video, shedding light on what is happening. I wonder who is the beneficiary of the Skrill crimes and who covers them !?
Declarations about the crime in financial monitoring were left without an adequate response, as usual. So, now is the coolest time for a public discussion of the crime committed. I am sure there are far more victims than criminal cases.
Attention, question to experts:
1) In which international institutions to write and who can help with the drafting of the text of documents?
Please share! If you have a skrill account, don’t waste your time, rather, withdraw money, because these foreign criminals do not care about the safety of your savings.
I just noticed you said may last year. You may be out of time. Damn. I can’t remember if the cut of time was a year from the the incident or a year from exhausting the Skrill appeal process. But I do remember a limitation on time to claim. Skrill was governed by the same rules and standards as uk B&M banks.
I just noticed you said may last year. You may be out of time. Damn. I can’t remember if the cut of time was a year from the the incident or a year from exhausting the Skrill appeal process. But I do remember a limitation on time to claim. Skrill was governed by the same rules and standards as uk B&M banks.
The time limit (six months) only applies if you receive a specific "final response" letter that includes a statement that you have the right to go to the Ombudsman. As these money transfer firms generally operate a "f-ck off and go away" approach to complaints it is highly unlikely that OP received a final response letter. Even if there was such a letter sent there might be an argument that OP should have received it written in his own language.
Skrill Ltd do still appear to be regulated by the FCA. (But that doesn't mean that OP dealt with that specific company as it might have been an unregulated sister company that dealt with OP).
The time limit (six months) only applies if you receive a specific "final response" letter that includes a statement that you have the right to go to the Ombudsman. As these money transfer firms generally operate a "f-ck off and go away" approach to complaints it is highly unlikely that OP received a final response letter. Even if there was such a letter sent there might be an argument that OP should have received it written in his own language.
Skrill Ltd do still appear to be regulated by the FCA. (But that doesn't mean that OP dealt with that specific company as it might have been an unregulated sister company that dealt with OP).
Hot on the heels it was possible to establish that the money went to the account issued for invalid data. Although earlier this payment, which was completely insolent from impunity, introduced mandatory user verification.
Correspondence with Skrill to the constructive result did not accept -
Google Translate? or Babblefish? I prefer Bing translator (with autodetect) myself.
