Quote:
Originally Posted by gdsfather
You'd have to make the game exceptionally complex though, otherwise it will be basically solved in a few days/weeks if there's a financial incentive.
I'm not so sure. Complexity for a human is not always the same as complexity for a bot. I think there have been threads with suggestions before for poker variants that a bot would have a hard time beating or that can't bruteforced with something like pio. Personally I also have no clue if other games such as Stud or whatever may be harder. Obviously PLO is.
Either way, even if you can't stop botting completely or even cheating in general, you can still remove the variants that are most susceptible to abuse, such as limit/short stacked HU hold'em. I think the moment there's a game variant in play that can be essentially solved when people throw enough resources at it then that's a problem. It's also a problem that can only grow bigger as people's databases increase in quality. Someone with mediocre solutions right now may have accurate solutions in 6 months, and someone with good short-stack solutions right now may decide to start computing deep-stack solutions and move from SNG's to cash.
Of course it's not all that easy. I'm well aware that it's best for the sites themself to offer these fast paced, low edge games. Recs may also love them, and other variants may not be that well received, but I don't think you can forever stick to offering turbo HUSNG's and the likes.