Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Is Higher Limits Easier? Is Higher Limits Easier?

12-18-2008 , 11:21 PM
lol @ everyone that HAVE to reply and just talk bs thinking they are funny.
also OP is talking about SNG not cash. it obv gets harder the higher you go in cash.
at SNG, i find it much easier to beat $5-20 than $1. not only is it impossible to read what villain has (not always, but very often), but stealing is ofter out of the question.

i almost never tilt, but $1 tilts the sh*t out of me.
Is Higher Limits Easier? Quote
12-18-2008 , 11:25 PM
give it a shot
Is Higher Limits Easier? Quote
12-19-2008 , 01:01 AM
First - sorry my English, not my mother tongue.

I think this is actually a pretty interesting topic, I´ve been playing poker for about 1 year now, reading a lot of books, watching videos and playing lots and lots of hands online and I´ve now started to move up the limits. I´ve got broke maybe 20 times and started it all over again from micros and moving up gradually in limits.

One thing which makes crazy about micro levels is the tilt factor, when I lose to a some donkey idiot who sucks me out so bad, I tilt and start playing very badly and this is honestly the main reason for losing all my roll in 30 minutes or so.

When I´ve managed to get up to higher levels (I play mainly sng´s but recently tried to pick up ring games too) I´ve noticed that even if I lose a big pot with a bad beat to a player I consider to be good I don´t tilt half as much, I somehow just take it as a part of the game. Somehow bluffing and playing the board comes also somehow more easier at higher levels.

Playing micros is also very mechanical, it´s harder to concentrate when your only goal is to grind your way up. When I´ve managed to make it to higher limits my own game improves a lot and I start to take poker more as an intellectual challenge, that is something very hard to do with low limit calling stations or idiotic maniacs.

I´m not saying that higher limits would be easier but OP has a interesting question here.

I go to sleep now.

Last edited by Parkparkparkpark; 12-19-2008 at 01:19 AM.
Is Higher Limits Easier? Quote
12-19-2008 , 01:13 AM
To the OP:


Stop triple barrelling your unimproved AK.

Stop bluffing all your busted draws on the river.

Stop slowplaying all your sets and str8s and flushes and boats and even your quads.

Stop doing all these things and you should do fine. And by fine I mean breakeven with rakeback.
Is Higher Limits Easier? Quote
12-19-2008 , 01:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by A_C_Slater
To the OP:


Stop triple barrelling your unimproved AK.

Stop bluffing all your busted draws on the river.

Stop slowplaying all your sets and str8s and flushes and boats and even your quads.

Stop doing all these things and you should do fine. And by fine I mean breakeven with rakeback.
lol
Is Higher Limits Easier? Quote
12-19-2008 , 01:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by A_C_Slater
To the OP:
And by fine I mean breakeven with rakeback.
OP should be fine. Good advice...
Is Higher Limits Easier? Quote
12-19-2008 , 02:04 AM
Assuming you have a few hundred bucks you can lose without crawling through the snow sobbing, "Why? Oh why?" some dark night, why not set it aside as your educational and experimental bankroll (assuming you already use coaching sites or aren't ready/willing to pay for that instead).

Now, kiss this bankroll goodbye, just in case you never see it again.

Play whatever stakes you darn well feel like.

If you lose, well maybe you can use whatever you learn from it later on, or even back at the micro tables.

Anyway, you could see a slight, very brief advantage if you currently play a lot with the same players, just because few people at the higher limits will have a clue who you are or how you play (jerktard data mining subscribers excepted).

It's what I'd do if I had an extra penny to my name. Cause even if the micros are easier, waiting all day for premium hands or rare chances to see a flop cheap with less is really, really, really BORING after awhile.
Is Higher Limits Easier? Quote
12-19-2008 , 07:44 AM
i love how all the posters below 100 are trying to defend OP, and attacking those that are clearly making fun of OP.
Is Higher Limits Easier? Quote
12-19-2008 , 07:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanDO
this thread is a joke
congrats on using your 11th post in revealing a universal secret. May your 12th post contain as much enlightenment as the one before!
Is Higher Limits Easier? Quote
12-19-2008 , 08:25 AM
I dare anyone to try n beat micro 1/2 limit O8 on stars. If after 2 hours u dont want to give up online poker and seriously ask questions of the intelligance of mankind or even question the possiblity of super users play tiny stakes. I would hand out the rest of my 4 figure roll to you.
Is Higher Limits Easier? Quote
12-19-2008 , 03:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToDeepToFold
Climbing Everest - why is this easier than getting on my girlfriend?

Your girlfriend is so fat...
Is Higher Limits Easier? Quote
12-19-2008 , 03:56 PM
Playing Poker for 3 years now and began my career at the micros. Sure there are bad beats and variance. But the players are easy to beat. Just play enough hands and the suckouts wont be a big thing. Players are so bad that a normal thinking humann being cant loose by playing enough.
Is Higher Limits Easier? Quote
12-19-2008 , 04:16 PM
Well, I went against my better judgement and posted in this thread, and as no surprise to me it was overlooked and people just started posting stuff like "the lag strategy is one of not adjusting" and everyone read that and latched on to it. Good luck all. Come to up to HSNL guys, I assure you we will all respect your raises.
Is Higher Limits Easier? Quote
12-19-2008 , 09:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bias1
congrats on using your 11th post in revealing a universal secret. May your 12th post contain as much enlightenment as the one before!
Congrats on your 548th ****ty post.
Is Higher Limits Easier? Quote
12-19-2008 , 10:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClutchCity
It didn't, noob.

The better question is, why was this ******ed OP bumped? Seriously, if you think a higher limit is easier due to "being able to beat thinking players because the fish at lower blah blah" then you are just flat-out bad at poker. Sorry, but that's it, plain and simple.
LOL, nice try
Is Higher Limits Easier? Quote
12-19-2008 , 10:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bias1
i love how all the posters below 100 are trying to defend OP, and attacking those that are clearly making fun of OP.
I love how all the poster over 100 actually think they are funny
Is Higher Limits Easier? Quote
12-20-2008 , 12:46 AM
I understand what you mean OP, but its still not true.

Its all about adjusting.

I believe your point is that if (for example) you get AA on medium-high stakes you can thin the field with a decent raise and play accordingly, in micro stakes theres just no amount of raise that will get less than 3 callers, even all in. It gets frustrating when you lose your bankroll with AA against somebody who doesnt know what hes doing callin all in with J7 (but it was suited!).

Variance is way higher in micro, but thats also true for predictability.

What this means is that you just have to sit and wait till you get a monster AFTER flop and bet it hard, no matter what you should find callers. This way you drastically reduce variance, and basically youll lose relatively small pots and win big ones.

Following this simple advice should get you through micro. Theres no simple advice that will get you through medium-high stakes. Thats why its easier.

1st post
Is Higher Limits Easier? Quote
12-20-2008 , 01:26 AM
[ ] poker is dead
Is Higher Limits Easier? Quote
12-20-2008 , 02:41 PM
This could well be the most ******ed thread ever seen on the interwebz - definetely ******ed enough that my opinion is needed. Why is everyone acting as if there's no such thing as a LAG at higher stakes!? I only play micro's but if there's no-one there to bluff you off your marginal hands at higher stakes, then surely YOU ARE GOING TO WIN AT POKER! At least with rakeback...

Quote:
Originally Posted by jackaaron
OP, yes, there is more folding going on in higher limits.

That doesn't mean it's easier.

In fact, I think it makes it harder. Example:

I've noticed that my higher limit table is playing fairly tight. I've loosened my opening hand range (hands I initiate betting with pre-flop), but the blinds are low. 10/20, 15/30, 25/50.

I steal a few blinds, and in the SnG you're thinking of, I've went from 1500, to potentially 1700.

I get AA, UTG, and think, "Yes! Someone is going to call me!" I 3x it, and no one calls.

Now I'm in the cutoff in the 25/50 with 1750, and I have QT. Again, the table is playing very tight. I 3x it, and the button, makes it 450. I fold since I basically HAVE to fold.

We're in the 50/100 now, no one has busted out of the SnG, and it folds around to be on the button. The two blinds have been playing REALLY tight, so I raise it up with XX, and the BB reships all in. I fold. All the folding that's been going on, all the small little pots I've "stolen" and I'm still under my starting stack if I didn't get a great hand against a very good 2nd best hand.

...the point is that it's really hard to get the "home-run" type of pots in higher limits that you get in lower limits. You're basically having to get as creative as you can to get the smallest pots. The higher limits players are more patient than you, more disciplined, way more focused, way more fearless, and in emotional control.

You play them enough, and all the sudden you wish you COULD get someone to call you down with middle pair. Don't forget all the times in lower limits where you had a great hand, and someone has called your all in with 40bbs with top pair 9 kicker.

It's WAY easier in lower limits.
This post makes the baby Jesus cry - all these internet whizzkids that are winning the tornaments these days are the only ones making bluffs and reraising light, making them the only good players on the internet? And for the bolded bit, so these players are sitting around for an hour before they fearlessly shove in the best hand that's never gonna get called as they've played so tight?

And obviously the higher stakes are gonna be harder than the lower, since if the fish can't afford the higher losses then they just aren't gonna be found as regularly as the decent players, who are thinking rationally when playing. Unless there's a Canadian billionaire in town

Last edited by Hickley; 12-20-2008 at 02:48 PM.
Is Higher Limits Easier? Quote

      
m