Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHierophant
So here's my question?
Yes, this is your question.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHierophant
If you are going to build a rep as the (self)proclaimed best at what you do then shouldn't it only make sense to play at the highest levels, competing w/ the best in your field, consistently?
Oh, you have another question.
I don't think he's doing a lot of rep building any more, as he can ride his WSOP bracelet total for a long time, but even if he is, a spur of the moment trip to Machu Picchu and the Galápagos Islands sounds like a pretty awesome thing to do instead of playing a tournament, and I don't think it's going to hurt his reputation a whole lot.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHierophant
It doesn't make sense, to me anyway, to do the former but not the latter. It's the equivalent of someone on the level of Serena Williams or Tiger Woods stepping down to play on a pro-am level of their respective sports.
You didn't mention a latter, but I guess you mean "playing less worthy opponents"? If that's what he's doing, and is what he wants to do, I don't know why this doesn't make sense. It might not be what you would choose to do, but playing tournaments he wants to while travelling the world sounds like a pretty awesome life to me. It not being what you or anyone else would choose to do is completely independent from it making sense.