Quote:
Originally Posted by wilson1560
At the end of the day, being a great poker player is about making the most money
NO NO NO, so if we listen to your definition of great poker player (yeah being pretty fair and accurate on your skill/your opponents' skill evaluation is a skill) a guy winning 3bb/100 in 2NL is a better player than a guy losing -1bb/100 in 10kNL online versus the beastest beasts LOL
The losing (almost breakeven so with rake - which is low at HS in bb/100 - someone who wouldn't lose/lose really a small amount at HS) player is a million times more knowledgeable/a better player than a small winner at micros.
Hellmuth is not a great poker player.
With this definition of great player a guy like Bilzerian who has never proved anything in terms of poker skill would be considered a genius (assumptions since i don't know much he wins at poker, i don't know his skill neither).
But yeah being a great player to you = being famous or born super rich to be able to play vs re tarded (pokerwise) whales ...
Anyone reading 2+2 regularly and therefore knowing poker strategy quite a bit could beat uninformed rich whales "having fun" ...
Last edited by I'mAFrenchDonkey; 12-05-2014 at 08:58 PM.