Quote:
Originally Posted by dude45
What if I'm away from my pc to take a piss or get a drank or my cay has jumped in my lap to get some loving. Just because a player doesn't install muck a crap hand it isn't always cheating
Agreed ... speed of actions pretty much has nothing to do with whether someone is cheating ... regardless of method.
Every session I play there are at least several hands with easy preflop decisions, but my action is delayed due to an important / hard decision on a different table. Right now I stack my tables, as it's the only way I can play 8-10 tables effectively on a laptop screen.
The biggest problem I see with detecting cheating by comparing to known solutions are that people deviate from solutions all the time in many different ways ... bet sizings, hand selection etc. so it's hard to accurately define what counts as a match when a spot is not identical to the solution in every way.
I can see how someone could still generally follow along with a solution even when they have deviated in some way - such as maybe on the BTN they raise a limper - and decide to follow the CO vs BB solution or they follow a solution that best matches the ranges a villain is playing in a certain spot ... even if the solution they are using isn't actually for that particular spot ... and that could be more detectable ... but it's certainly not easy since there are so many spots to check and millions of hands being played.
This is not a simple problem to solve in any way.
Last edited by ten25; 01-02-2024 at 10:06 PM.