Quote:
Originally Posted by dude45
Sorry the ass pulling part was directed more at people in general. Something I have a difficult time understanding with poker players is why can't they except thst we've gotten to a point where the more intelligent and more studied players are gonna win the monies. The days of figuring **** out on the fly are long gone. Poker and chess are similarly solved yet as far as I know people aren' pushing to change the rules of chess. I honestly don't have a problem with whatever game you or anyone else wants to come up with . So long as it's an alternate and not a replacement. So if ACR adds 7-2 games tomorrow fine but if they also shutter all the traditional holdem games I wouldn't like that
Well, that's the worst comparison you could have made. In chess, the only real competition is in live tournaments and strictly controlled online events, all online platforms for chess are overrun with cheats. If that's the future you have for poker it's deeply depressing. Also, GTOwizard's new AI is only the tip of the iceberg, every possible format is gonna be solved such that it's unbeatable by human play. The only viable solution is designing the game in a way that changes the game tree enough to make the precomputed solution -ev.
Implementing fun challenges like stand-up, bomb pots, double boards, and many others can spice up the game for recreational players and change the game dynamic enough to make the solves unprofitable.