Quote:
Originally Posted by SGT RJ
Questions about the bluff challenge are very relevant - essentially because that is where many of the visible loose threads lie.
(Maybe you should also post the contents of these posts in spoilers - I'm not sure HSNLtards know how to click links to NVG)
Anyway, during the segment 2(a) of JM's interview he talks about playing 4 sessions (? mathces?) on the girahh account - saying that he played at 25/50PLO and 50/100NL (all HU) - or maybe one time at 25/50NL and that these were probably in April with one (or just possibly more) in May.
That looks like strong circumstantial evidence for him playing the matches against TylerSmith, Arnie etc. Against is JM's bizarre claim that Jose would have won the Bluff challenge if he (JM) hadn't played PLO on the account. But is did that just mean that the girahh account would have won? idk - so much relative truth
And what about the loss of the 90k for winning. Does JM feel that he cost Jose - or maybe
the group - that money? If not, why not?